Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

07:34
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
Published on: August 22, 2018
8.3K
Invited review: Recursive models in animal breeding: Interpretation, limitations, and extensions
1Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/ Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.
Journal of Dairy Science
|March 4, 2023
Summary
Recursive models (RM) and mixed multitrait models (MTM) in animal breeding are often equivalent, but differ in biological interpretation and application for estimating breeding values and genetic parameters. Understanding these differences aids in causal inference.
Area of Science:
- Quantitative Genetics
- Animal Breeding
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Structural equation models (SEM) enable the analysis of causal relationships between variables, distinguishing between unidirectional (recursive models; RM) and bidirectional (simultaneous models) causality.
- Recursive models (RM) are a type of SEM used in animal breeding to understand causal effects and interpret genetic parameters and estimated breeding values.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the properties of recursive models (RM) in animal breeding.
- To clarify the interpretation of genetic parameters and estimated breeding values derived from RM.
- To compare RM with mixed multitrait models (MTM) for causal inference in animal genetics.
Main Methods:
- Review and comparison of statistical properties between recursive models (RM) and mixed multitrait models (MTM).
- Analysis of variance-covariance matrices and parameter restrictions for model identification and inference.
- Transformation of estimates between RM and MTM frameworks.
Main Results:
- RM and MTM are statistically equivalent under specific assumptions regarding variance-covariance matrices and model identification.
- Biological interpretations of breeding values differ: MTM breeding values represent the total additive genetic effect, while RM breeding values account for causal traits being held constant.
- Differences in genetic effects between RM and MTM can identify genomic regions influencing trait variation directly or indirectly.
Conclusions:
- RM and MTM provide complementary insights into genetic architecture and causality in animal breeding.
- RM breeding values are useful for identifying causal pathways, while MTM breeding values are recommended for selection purposes.
- Extensions of RM facilitate modeling complex quantitative traits, including sequentially expressed traits and subgroup-specific causality.

