Consistency of left ventricular ejection fraction measurements in the early time course of STEMI

Lilyana Georgieva1, Fabian Nienhaus1, Sebastian M Haberkorn1

  • 1Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Insights

Two-dimensional left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) analysis is reliable across multiple imaging methods early after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Stroke volume (SV) measurements varied significantly between techniques.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Cardiovascular Research

Background:

  • Left ventricular (LV) function assessment after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is complicated by early LV remodeling and microvascular dysfunction.
  • Accurate LV function evaluation is critical for guiding treatment and predicting outcomes post-STEMI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and stroke volume (SV) measurements using various imaging modalities in the early phase after STEMI.
  • To determine the interchangeability of different imaging techniques for assessing LV function post-STEMI.

Main Methods:

  • Serial imaging (24 hours and 5 days) was performed in 82 STEMI patients.
  • Techniques included cineventriculography (CVG), 2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), and 2D/3D cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).
  • LVEF and SV were calculated and compared across modalities.

Main Results:

  • Two-dimensional LVEF measurements were consistent across CVG, 2DE, and 2D CMR at both time points.
  • SV measurements by CVG and 2DE were comparable, but 2D CMR yielded higher values due to increased LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV).
  • 3D CMR showed higher volumetric measurements than 2D CMR, irrespective of infarct characteristics.

Conclusions:

  • Two-dimensional LVEF assessment is robust and interchangeable between CVG, 2DE, and 2D CMR early after STEMI.
  • Significant discrepancies in SV measurements exist between imaging techniques, primarily driven by differences in volumetric quantification.
  • Standardization of volumetric measurements is needed for consistent SV assessment across different imaging modalities post-STEMI.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos