Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

4.4K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.4K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.9K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.9K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

176
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
176
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

153
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
153
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.4K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.4K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

1.7K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Potential Drug-Drug Interactions With Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Among Long-Term Care Facility Residents.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association·2026
Same author

Impact of empiric potassium supplementation on mortality, sudden cardiac arrest and stroke in furosemide initiators.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2026
Same author

Ambient Temperature and Psoriatic Arthritis Odds Among Patients With Psoriasis: A Cross-sectional Analysis.

Journal of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis·2026
Same author

Clinician Perceptions of Therapeutic Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Qualitative Study.

Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP·2026
Same author

Stains in primary biliary cholangitis: Untangling promise from bias.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·2026
Same author

The impact of opioid withdrawal symptoms on pain outcomes in enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trials: a mediation meta-analysis of trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration.

Pain·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Research and scholarly methods: Propensity scores.

Dominique Medaglio1,2, Alisa J Stephens-Shields1,2,3,4, Charles E Leonard1,2,3

  • 1Center for Pharmacoepidemiology Research and Training, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, PA).

Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP
|March 6, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Propensity score methods help reduce bias in drug studies by creating comparable groups. This review introduces pharmacists and researchers to these essential statistical techniques for better research design and reporting.

Keywords:
Evidence based medicineHealth services researchPharmacoepidemiology

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacoepidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Confounding bias is a significant challenge in pharmacoepidemiologic research.
  • Propensity score methods offer a statistical approach to mitigate this bias.
  • Accurate control of confounding is crucial for valid study findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of propensity score methods for controlling confounding bias.
  • To introduce pharmacists and researchers to the application and evaluation of propensity scores.
  • To facilitate informed discussions on propensity score methodology in research.

Main Methods:

  • This is a methods review, summarizing existing literature and best practices.
  • Key concepts covered include propensity score definition, calculation, and application.
  • Methods for assessing and achieving covariate balance are discussed.

Main Results:

  • Propensity scores are dimension-reducing balancing scores.
  • They enable the creation of comparable treatment and reference groups based on measured covariates.
  • Effective evaluation of covariate balance is essential for valid propensity score application.

Conclusions:

  • Propensity score methods are valuable tools for reducing confounding bias in pharmacoepidemiologic studies.
  • Understanding assumptions and evaluation techniques is key to appropriate application.
  • This review equips researchers with foundational knowledge for using and discussing propensity scores.