Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Labeling DNA Probes03:31

Labeling DNA Probes

8.2K
DNA probes are fragments of DNA labeled with a reporter tag to enable their detection or purification. The resulting labeled DNA probes can then hybridize to target nucleic acid sequences through complementary base-pairing, and may be used to recover or identify these regions.
Radioisotopes, fluorophores, or small molecule binding partners like biotin or digoxigenin, are the most widely used reporter tags for labeling DNA probes. These labels can be attached to the probe DNA molecule via...
8.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors Influencing Timing of First Antenatal Care Visit Among Bangladeshi Women: Application of Accelerated Failure Time Models Using Demographic Health Survey 2022.

Health science reports·2026
Same author

Effect of Spatial Distribution, Storage, and Cooking Methods on the Volatile Profile of Atlantic Salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>): Influence of Pre-Harvest Rearing Conditions, Sex and Presence of Skin.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Longevity and Magnitude of Antibody Responses After Homologous and Heterologous COVID-19 Booster Vaccinations in Bangladesh.

Vaccines·2026
Same author

Tissue-specific transcriptomic analysis of accelerated reproductive development of immature Queensland fruit fly induced by raspberry ketone ingestion.

BMC genomics·2026
Same author

Chromosome-scale genome of Culicoides brevitarsis provides a resource for comparative and vector biology studies.

Parasites & vectors·2026
Same author

Lipid-, Protein-, and Environmental Contamination Derived Off-Odor Volatile Compound Formation in Refrigerated Atlantic Salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) Fillets and the Role of Rearing Conditions.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 7, 2025

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
04:17

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning

Published on: May 10, 2024

838

Machine learning for detecting DNA attachment on SPR biosensor.

Himadri Shekhar Mondal1,2, Khandaker Asif Ahmed3, Nick Birbilis4,5

  • 1ANU College of Engineering, Computing and Cybernetics, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2600, Australia. himadrishekhar.mondal@anu.edu.au.

Scientific Reports
|March 6, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces machine learning models to enhance the accuracy of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensors for DNA detection and classification. The developed models show high performance, paving the way for improved diagnostic tools.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements in DNA Nanosensors &#8211; Addressing Sensitivity and Selectivity Challenges in Molecular Detection
07:16

Author Spotlight: Advancements in DNA Nanosensors – Addressing Sensitivity and Selectivity Challenges in Molecular Detection

Published on: February 9, 2024

1.1K
Real Time Measurements of Membrane Protein:Receptor Interactions Using Surface Plasmon Resonance SPR
09:35

Real Time Measurements of Membrane Protein:Receptor Interactions Using Surface Plasmon Resonance SPR

Published on: November 29, 2014

22.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 7, 2025

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
04:17

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning

Published on: May 10, 2024

838
Author Spotlight: Advancements in DNA Nanosensors &#8211; Addressing Sensitivity and Selectivity Challenges in Molecular Detection
07:16

Author Spotlight: Advancements in DNA Nanosensors – Addressing Sensitivity and Selectivity Challenges in Molecular Detection

Published on: February 9, 2024

1.1K
Real Time Measurements of Membrane Protein:Receptor Interactions Using Surface Plasmon Resonance SPR
09:35

Real Time Measurements of Membrane Protein:Receptor Interactions Using Surface Plasmon Resonance SPR

Published on: November 29, 2014

22.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Biosensor Technology
  • Machine Learning Applications

Background:

  • Optoelectric biosensors, particularly surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based sensors, are crucial for label-free detection of biomolecular interactions in biomedical diagnostics.
  • While SPR biosensors offer high precision, there's a need for robust machine learning (ML) models to assess their accuracy and ensure reliable datasets for disease diagnosis.
  • Current ML models often lack specific validation for SPR biosensor data, hindering downstream applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate innovative machine learning models for DNA detection and classification using data from SPR biosensors.
  • To assess the performance of various ML classifiers on SPR-generated datasets, focusing on reflective light angles and gold surface properties.
  • To establish reliable methods for evaluating SPR biosensor accuracy and ensuring data quality for future diagnostic tool development.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized reflective light angles and gold surface properties from SPR biosensors as input features for ML models.
  • Applied t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) for feature extraction and min-max normalization to differentiate low-variance classifiers.
  • Experimented with multiple ML classifiers including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), and Random Forest (RF).

Main Results:

  • Achieved high accuracy for DNA classification (0.94) using Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN).
  • Reached superior accuracy for DNA detection (0.96) with Random Forest (RF) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN).
  • Random Forest (RF) demonstrated the best overall performance with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.97, precision of 0.96, and F1-score of 0.97 for both detection and classification tasks.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning models show significant potential in advancing SPR biosensor development and performance evaluation.
  • The developed ML models provide a reliable framework for assessing SPR biosensor accuracy and data quality.
  • This research paves the way for creating novel diagnostic and prognostic tools for various diseases based on enhanced biosensor technology.