Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

External comparisons with the case-cohort design.

S Wacholder¹, J F Boivin

¹Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

American Journal of Epidemiology

|December 1, 1987

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Risk factors for susceptibility to varicella in newly arrived adult migrants in Canada.

Epidemiology and infection·2013

Same author

Plasma cytokine levels and human papillomavirus infection at the cervix in rural Nigerian women.

Cytokine·2013

Same author

Risk of renal cell carcinoma in relation to blood telomere length in a population-based case-control study.

British journal of cancer·2011

Same author

Meat-cooking mutagens and risk of renal cell carcinoma.

British journal of cancer·2011

Same author

The international study of insulin and cancer.

Lancet (London, England)·2010

Same author

Family history of cancer and renal cell cancer risk in Caucasians and African Americans.

British journal of cancer·2010

Same journal

Correction to: Home dampness and molds and occurrence of respiratory tract infections in the first 27 years of life: the Espoo Cohort Study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

Same journal

A SIMPLE AND POWERFUL TEST OF VACCINE WANING.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Association Between maternal body mass index, offspring growth and pubertal timing: results from a longitudinal birth cohort study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Correction to: Developing a novel algorithm to identify incident and prevalent dementia in Medicare claims-the ARIC Study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

Same journal

RE: advancing observational research on arts and health: theory-informed approaches using the RADIANCE framework.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Maternal Cesarean Section and Offspring ASD or ADHD Risk: A Nurses' Health Study II Analysis.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

See all related articles

The case-cohort design offers a cost-effective alternative to traditional cohort studies for comparing risks. This method efficiently estimates relative risks by analyzing a subcohort, significantly reducing data collection costs with minimal efficiency loss.

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Biostatistics

Background:

The standard cohort design is resource-intensive for epidemiological studies.
The case-cohort design, introduced by Prentice (1986), provides an economical alternative for relative risk estimation within a cohort.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the utility of the case-cohort design for comparing risks between exposure groups and an external population.
To investigate methods for estimating expected cases in the total cohort using subcohort exposure data.

Main Methods:

The study examines theoretical and empirical properties of various case-cohort design and analysis approaches.
Empirical validation involved simulating subcohort selection within a real-world study of second cancer risk post-chemotherapy.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

The case-cohort design significantly reduces costs associated with covariate information collection.
In a specific cancer study, this design could save five-sixths of the cost while incurring only an 11% efficiency reduction compared to a full cohort study.

Conclusions:

The case-cohort design is a valuable and economical tool for epidemiological research, particularly for comparing risks.
It provides a practical approach to risk assessment with substantial cost savings and acceptable efficiency.