Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Associations between body composition and radiotherapy-related side-effects and health-related quality of life in patients with prostate or lung cancer: sub-analysis of the REQUITE trial.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026
Same author

Nivolumab plus chemoradiotherapy followed by nivolumab with or without ipilimumab for untreated locally advanced stage III NSCLC: a randomized phase 3 trial.

Nature cancer·2026
Same author

Metastatic Trajectories in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Guide Local and Systemic Therapies.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same author

Clinical trial endpoints for metastases-directed therapy in oligometastatic cancer: a review and Delphi consensus on behalf of the EORTC-ESTRO OligoCare consortium.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Genetic determinants of fatigue up to 2 years after radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Reply regarding the European Respiratory Society and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on fitness for curative intent treatment of lung cancer.

The European respiratory journal·2026
Same journal

Role of radiotherapy in refractory/relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma in the era of targeted therapies and immunotherapy.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Moving beyond anatomy: the future of rectal cancer management is biologically-informed, response-adapted, and patient-centered.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Organ preservation in rectal cancer following clinical complete response after short-course radiotherapy-based total neoadjuvant therapy.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Radiotherapy quality assurance in the PRO-GLIO trial: results from a dummy run comparing experts across twelve institutions in two Scandinavian countries.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Patient selection and toxicity predictors in proton reirradiation for locoregional breast cancer recurrence.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Wide dural radiation therapy for NF2-SWN associated meningiomatosis.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K

Machine learning for normal tissue complication probability prediction: Predictive power with versatility and easy

Pratik Samant1,2, Dirk de Ruysscher3, Frank Hoebers3

  • 1Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Physics, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
|March 7, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning (ML) models offer a robust alternative to the Lyman-Burman Kutcher (LKB) model for predicting radiotherapy toxicity. ML models demonstrate superior convergence, speed, and flexibility, matching or exceeding LKB model performance in predicting normal tissue complications.

Keywords:
AB, AdaBooost (aka Adaptive Boosting)Clinical radiobiologyDA, Dual AnnealingDE, Differential EvolutionDT, Decision TreeDVH, Dose Volume HistogramGB, Gradient BoostGD, Gradient DescentGMD, Generalized Mean DoseHead and Neck CancerLKB, Lyman Kutcher BurmanLR, Logistic RegressionML, Machine LearningMachine LearningNTCP, Normal Tissue Complication ProbabilityNormal Tissue Complication ProbabilityOAR, Organ(s) at RiskRT, RadiotherapyRadiotherapyTreatment PlanningXerostomia

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

161

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

161

Area of Science:

  • Radiotherapy
  • Medical Physics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • The Lyman-Burman Kutcher (LKB) model is widely used for predicting normal tissue complication (NTCP) after radiotherapy (RT).
  • However, the LKB model can exhibit numerical instability and relies solely on generalized mean dose (GMD).
  • Machine learning (ML) algorithms present a potential advancement with improved predictive power and fewer limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the numerical characteristics and predictive performance of the LKB model against ML models.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of ML in predicting radiotherapy-induced toxicity.

Main Methods:

  • Both LKB and ML models were developed to predict G2 Xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients post-RT.
  • Input features included the dose-volume histogram of parotid glands.
  • Model speed, convergence, and predictive power were assessed on an independent training set.

Main Results:

  • Global optimization was required for a convergent and predictive LKB model.
  • ML models demonstrated unconditional convergence and predictive capability, robust to gradient descent.
  • ML models surpassed the LKB model in Brier score and accuracy, while ROC-AUC performance was comparable.

Conclusions:

  • ML models effectively quantify NTCP, performing as well as or better than LKB models, even for LKB-suited toxicities.
  • ML models offer significant advantages in convergence, speed, and flexibility.
  • ML models represent a promising alternative for clinical RT planning decisions.