Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Characterization of Thermal Transport in One-dimensional Solid Materials
Published on: January 26, 2014
Effects of interfacial molecular mobility on thermal boundary conductance at solid-liquid interface
Abhijith Anandakrishnan1, Bladimir Ramos-Alvarado2, Sridhar Kumar Kannam3
1Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
Molecular mobility significantly impacts thermal boundary conductance (TBC) between graphene and liquids. Water
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Thermodynamics
- Computational Chemistry
Background:
- Interfacial thermal transport is crucial for thermal management in nanoscale devices.
- Understanding molecular mobility's role in thermal boundary conductance (TBC) is key to optimizing heat dissipation.
- Graphene-water and graphene-perfluorohexane interfaces serve as model systems for studying liquid-solid thermal interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of interfacial molecular mobility on TBC across graphene-water and graphene-perfluorohexane interfaces.
- To elucidate the mechanisms governing thermal transport at these interfaces under varying temperatures.
- To compare the thermal transport behaviors of water and perfluorohexane at the graphene interface.
Main Methods:
- Non-equilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) simulations were employed.
- Molecular mobility was controlled by equilibrating nanoconfined liquids (water and perfluorohexane) at different temperatures.
- Thermal boundary conductance was analyzed, including spectral decomposition.
Main Results:
- Perfluorohexane exhibited low molecular mobility and a layered structure across a wide temperature range (200-450 K).
- Water showed increased mobility and diffusion at higher temperatures, significantly contributing to thermal transport.
- Graphene-water TBC showed a quadratic temperature dependence, while graphene-perfluorohexane TBC showed a linear dependence.
- Enhanced spectral transmission and low-frequency modes were observed in interfacial water due to higher molecular mobility.
Conclusions:
- Higher molecular mobility and enhanced spectral transmission in water explain its superior thermal transport compared to perfluorohexane.
- Interfacial molecular mobility is a critical factor determining thermal boundary conductance.
- The distinct thermal transport characteristics are attributed to differences in molecular structure and dynamics between water and perfluorohexane.
More Related Videos
06:26Orientational Transition in a Liquid Crystal Triggered by the Thermodynamic Growth of Interfacial Wetting Sheets
Published on: May 15, 2017
10:01Thermal Scanning Conductometry TSC as a General Method for Studying and Controlling the Phase Behavior of Conductive Physical Gels
Published on: January 23, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Distribution of Molecular Speeds
Intermolecular Forces and Physical Properties
Boundary Conditions for Current Density
Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids
Boundary Layer Characteristics
Comparing Intermolecular Forces: Melting Point, Boiling Point, and Miscibility
Temporary attractive forces like dispersion are present in all molecules, whether they are polar or nonpolar. They...