Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025
A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
Published on: April 21, 2017
Objective psychomotor laparoscopic skills evaluation using a low-cost wearable device based on accelerometry:
Iván Tlacaélel Franco-González1, Arturo Minor-Martínez2, Ricardo Manuel Ordorica-Flores3
1Sección de Bioelectrónica, Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Centro de Investigación Y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508, Col. San Pedro Zacatenco, 07360, Ciudad de México, México.
Background:
Motion analysis of surgical maneuvers provides useful quantitative information for the objective evaluation of the surgeons. However, surgical simulation laboratories for laparoscopic training do not usually integrate devices that help quantify the level of skills of the surgeons due to their limited resources and the high costs of new technologies. The purpose of this study is to present the construct and concurrent validity of a low-cost motion tracking system, based on a wireless triaxial accelerometer, employed to objectively evaluate psychomotor skills of surgeons during laparoscopic training.
Methods:
An accelerometry system, a wireless three-axis accelerometer with appearance of wristwatch, was placed on the dominant hand of the surgeons to register the motion during the laparoscopy practice with the EndoViS simulator, which simultaneously recorded the motion of the laparoscopic needle driver. This study included the participation of 30 surgeons (6 experts, 14 intermediates and 10 novices) who performed the task of intracorporeal knot-tying suture. Using 11 motion analysis parameters (MAPs), the performance of each participant was assessed. Subsequently, the scores of the three groups of surgeons were statistically analyzed. In addition, a validity study was conducted comparing the metrics between the accelerometry-tracking system and the EndoViS hybrid simulator.
Results:
Construct validity was achieved for 8 of the 11 metrics examined with the accelerometry system. Concurrent validity demonstrated that there is a strong correlation between the results of the accelerometry system and the EndoViS simulator in 9 of 11 parameters, showing reliability of the accelerometry system as an objective evaluation method.
Conclusion:
The accelerometry system was successfully validated. This method is potentially useful to complement the objective evaluation of surgeons during laparoscopic practice in training environments such as box-trainers and simulators.
