Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why predictive indexes perform less well in validation studies. Is it magic or methods?

M E Charlson1, K L Ales, R Simon

  • 1Department of Medicine, Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY.

Archives of Internal Medicine
|December 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ocular Syphilis: Experience over 11 Years at a German Ophthalmology Reference Centre.

Ocular immunology and inflammation·2021
Same author

Development and Assessment of a Simulator for in Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Fungal and Acanthamoeba Keratitis.

Current eye research·2020
Same author

[The German keratomycosis registry : Initial results of a multicenter survey].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2019
Same author

Prevalence and characterization of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in patients with cystic fibrosis: a prospective multicentre study in Germany.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2018
Same author

[Peri-ocular Necrotising Fasciitis - Case Report and Overview].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2017
Same author

"Nudging" in microbiological reports: a strategy to improve prescribing.

Infection·2016

Methodologic differences in patient selection, surveillance, and outcome definitions can significantly impact the performance of cardiac risk indexes. Ensuring consistency in these methods may improve prognostic index reliability in new patient groups.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Prognostic indexes often show reduced performance when applied to new patient populations.
  • Methodologic variations in study design are frequently overlooked as reasons for these discrepancies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine how differences in population assembly, postoperative surveillance, and cardiac complication criteria affect the performance of Goldman's cardiac risk index.
  • To demonstrate the impact of these methodologic variations on prognostic index reliability.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study of 232 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery was conducted.
  • Methods from Goldman's original study and three other studies were simulated.
  • Variations in eligibility criteria, surveillance strategies, and outcome definitions were analyzed.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • When only population assembly criteria differed, complication rates remained consistent (5.2%-6.9%).
  • Significant discrepancies in cardiac complication rates emerged when different surveillance and outcome criteria were used (e.g., Class 2 rates varied from 2% to 23%).

Conclusions:

  • Discrepancies in prognostic index performance are often due to variations in surveillance and outcome definitions.
  • Methodologic consistency is crucial for maintaining the reliability of predictive indexes across different studies and populations.