Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

60.8K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.8K
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

56.2K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
56.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impaired Remodeling of Tight Junctions Associated with Loss of Enamel Rod Decussation in Tgfbr2<sup>G357W/+</sup> Mice.

Calcified tissue international·2026
Same author

Inorganic arsenic exposure and modifying factors: a systematic evidence map.

Human and ecological risk assessment : HERA·2026
Same author

Loeys-Dietz syndrome: 2026 updated care management primer.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same author

Beyond autonomy: why medicine needs artificial intelligence teammates, not artificial intelligence doctors.

Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)·2026
Same author

A Computational Framework for Simulating Patient-Specific TMJ Biomechanics Using a Combined Multibody Dynamics and Finite Element Approach.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

The 2024 Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge Meningioma Radiotherapy (BraTS-MEN-RT) dataset.

Scientific data·2026
Same journal

Literature Reviews After AI.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same journal

Illustration of transfer learning from breast cancer detection to risk prediction: adaptation to local data and local objectives.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same journal

RadGazeGen: radiomics and gaze-guided chest X-ray generation using diffusion models.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same journal

DDARes-U<sup>2</sup>Net: a dual-decoder adversarial residual U<sup>2</sup>Net algorithm for segmentation of COVID-19 pneumonia lesions.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same journal

High-speed optical tracking and augmented reality platform for image-guided interventions.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same journal

Transplant-ready? Evaluating AI lung segmentation models in candidates with severe lung disease.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.1K

Relational reasoning network for anatomical landmarking.

Neslisah Torosdagli1, Syed Anwar1,2,3, Payal Verma4

  • 1University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States.

Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
|March 9, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel Relational Reasoning Network (RRN) for accurate anatomical landmarking of craniomaxillofacial bones without segmentation. The RRN effectively identifies missing landmarks, even with severe bone pathology, improving surgical planning.

Keywords:
anatomical landmarkingcraniomaxillofacial bonesdeep relational learningrelational reasoningsurgical modeling

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

2.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

917

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.1K
Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

2.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

917

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Computer Vision
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Accurate anatomical landmarking is essential for craniomaxillofacial (CMF) surgery planning and deformation analysis.
  • Traditional methods often rely on explicit bone segmentation, which can fail with severe pathology or bone deformation.
  • This limitation necessitates novel approaches for robust landmark identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a deep learning network for anatomical landmarking of CMF bones (mandible, maxilla, nasal) without explicit segmentation.
  • To accurately learn local and global landmark relationships within CMF bones.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a novel, efficient deep network architecture: Relational Reasoning Network (RRN).
  • RRN operates end-to-end, utilizing learned landmark relations via dense-block units.
  • Treated landmarking as a data imputation problem, predicting missing landmarks from given inputs.

Main Results:

  • Applied RRN to 250 patient cone-beam computed tomography scans.
  • Achieved an average root mean squared error of per landmark using fourfold cross-validation.
  • Demonstrated accurate identification of missing landmarks, even with severe pathology or bone deformations.

Conclusions:

  • The RRN system successfully identifies anatomical landmark relations using deep learning, a novel approach.
  • This method overcomes limitations of segmentation-based techniques, offering improved accuracy in challenging cases.
  • The findings contribute to enhanced deformation analysis and surgical planning in CMF procedures.