Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Innovative Technique for Coronary Angiography in Marginal Donors
Published on: July 12, 2024
Discriminative Role of Invasive Left Heart Catheterization in Patients Suspected of Heart Failure With Preserved
Ki Hong Choi1, Jeong Hoon Yang1,2, Jeong Hun Seo3
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea.
Insights
Invasive left ventricular end-diastolic pressure measurements improve the diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), especially for patients with intermediate HFA-PEFF scores. This invasive measure offers crucial prognostic information beyond noninvasive assessments.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Noninvasive parameters for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) can yield intermediate, nondiagnostic results.
- Invasive hemodynamic measurements and diastolic stress testing are increasingly emphasized for HFpEF diagnosis.
- The Heart Failure Association Pre-test Assessment, Echocardiography & Natriuretic Peptide, Functional Testing, Final Etiology (HFA-PEFF) score is a noninvasive tool for HFpEF assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the discriminative and prognostic roles of invasive left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in suspected HFpEF.
- To specifically assess the utility of invasive measurements in patients with intermediate HFA-PEFF scores.
Main Methods:
- 404 patients with suspected HF and preserved left ventricular systolic function were enrolled.
- Left heart catheterization with left ventricular end-diastolic pressure measurement was performed to confirm HFpEF (≥16 mmHg).
- The primary outcome was all-cause death or HF readmission within 10 years.
Main Results:
- 80.2% of patients were diagnosed with invasively confirmed HFpEF; 19.8% had noncardiac dyspnea.
- The HFA-PEFF score showed modest discriminative ability for HFpEF (AUC, 0.70).
- Invasive HFpEF diagnosis was associated with a higher 10-year risk of death or HF readmission, particularly in patients with intermediate HFA-PEFF scores (HR, 3.327).
Conclusions:
- The HFA-PEFF score is moderately useful for predicting adverse events in suspected HFpEF.
- Invasive left ventricular end-diastolic pressure measurement provides additional prognostic information, especially for patients with intermediate HFA-PEFF scores.
- Invasive hemodynamics are valuable for refining HFpEF diagnosis and risk stratification.
Abstract:
Background Recently, diastolic stress testing and invasive hemodynamic measurements have been emphasized for diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) because when determined using noninvasive parameters it can fall into a nondiagnostic intermediate range. The current study evaluated the discriminative and prognostic roles of invasive measured left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in the population with suspected HFpEF, particularly for patients with intermediate Heart Failure Association Pre-test Assessment, Echocardiography & Natriuretic Peptide, Functional Testing, Final Etiology (HFA-PEFF) score. Methods and Results A total of 404 patients with symptoms or signs of HF and preserved left ventricular systolic function were enrolled. All subjects underwent left heart catheterization with left ventricular end-diastolic pressure measurement for confirmation of HFpEF (≥16 mm Hg). The primary outcome was all-cause death or readmission due to HF within 10 years. Among the study population, 324 patients (80.2%) were diagnosed as invasively confirmed HFpEF, and 80 patients (19.8%) were as noncardiac dyspnea. The patients with HFpEF showed a significantly higher HFA-PEFF score than the patients with noncardiac dyspnea (3.8±1.8 versus 2.6±1.5, P<0.001). The discriminative ability of the HFA-PEFF score for diagnosing HFpEF was modest (area under the curve, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.64-0.75], P<0.001). The HFA-PEFF score was associated with a significantly higher 10-year risk of death or HF readmission (per-1 increase, hazard ratio [HR], 1.603 [95% CI, 1.376-1.868], P<0.001). Among the 226 patients with an intermediate HFA-PEFF score (2-4), those with invasively confirmed HFpEF had a significantly higher risk of death or HF readmission within 10 years than the patients with noncardiac dyspnea (24.0% versus 6.9%, HR, 3.327 [95% CI, 1.109-16.280], P=0.030). Conclusions The HFA-PEFF score is a moderately useful tool for predicting future adverse events in suspected HFpEF, and invasively measured left ventricular end-diastolic pressure can provide additional information to discriminate patient prognosis, particularly in those with intermediate HFA-PEFF scores. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04505449.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

