Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Published on: May 20, 2020
GAP positions catalytic H-Ras residue Q61 for GTP hydrolysis in molecular dynamics simulations, complicating chemical
Lara A Patel1, Timothy J Waybright2, Andrew G Stephen2
1Theoretical Biology and Biophysics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA; Center for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
Abstract:
Functional interaction of Ras signaling proteins with upstream, negative regulatory GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) represents a crucial step in cellular decision making related to growth and survival. Key components of the catalytic transition state for Ras deactivation by GAP-accelerated hydrolysis of Ras-bound guanosine triphosphate (GTP) are thought to include an arginine residue from the GAP (the arginine finger), a glutamine residue from Ras (Q61), and a water molecule that is likely coordinated by Q61 to engage in nucleophilic attack on GTP. Here, we use in-vitro fluorescence experiments to show that 0.1-100 mM concentrations of free arginine, imidazole, and other small nitrogenous molecule fail to accelerate GTP hydrolysis, even in the presence of the catalytic domain of a mutant GAP lacking its arginine finger (R1276A NF1). This result is surprising given that imidazole can chemically rescue enzyme activity in arginine-to-alanine mutant protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) that share many active site components with Ras/GAP complexes. Complementary all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations reveal that an arginine finger GAP mutant still functions to enhance Ras Q61-GTP interaction, though less extensively than wild-type GAP. This increased Q61-GTP proximity may promote more frequent fluctuations into configurations that enable GTP hydrolysis as a component of the mechanism by which GAPs accelerate Ras deactivation in the face of arginine finger mutations. The failure of small molecule analogs of arginine to chemically rescue catalytic deactivation of Ras is consistent with the idea that the influence of the GAP goes beyond the simple provision of its arginine finger. However, the failure of chemical rescue in the presence of R1276A NF1 suggests that the GAPs arginine finger is either unsusceptible to rescue due to exquisite positioning or that it is involved in complex multivalent interactions. Therefore, in the context of oncogenic Ras proteins with mutations at codons 12 or 13 that inhibit arginine finger penetration toward GTP, drug-based chemical rescue of GTP hydrolysis may have bifunctional chemical/geometric requirements that are more difficult to satisfy than those that result from arginine-to-alanine mutations in other enzymes for which chemical rescue has been demonstrated.
Insights
Small molecules like arginine cannot rescue Ras GTP hydrolysis, even with a mutated GTPase-activating protein (GAP). This suggests GAPs offer more than just their arginine finger for Ras deactivation, complicating drug-based rescue strategies.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular Signaling
Background:
- Ras signaling proteins are crucial for cellular growth and survival.
- GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) negatively regulate Ras by accelerating GTP hydrolysis.
- The catalytic mechanism involves a GAP arginine finger, Ras Q61, and a water molecule.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if small molecules can chemically rescue Ras GTP hydrolysis.
- To determine the role of the GAP arginine finger in Ras deactivation.
- To explore potential drug-based rescue strategies for oncogenic Ras.
Main Methods:
- In-vitro fluorescence experiments to measure GTP hydrolysis rates.
- All-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to analyze protein interactions.
- Utilized a mutant GAP lacking its arginine finger (R1276A NF1).
Main Results:
- Free arginine and imidazole failed to accelerate GTP hydrolysis.
- A GAP mutant (R1276A NF1) still enhanced Ras Q61-GTP interaction, albeit less effectively.
- Small molecule analogs of arginine could not chemically rescue Ras deactivation.
Conclusions:
- The GAP's function extends beyond simply providing an arginine finger.
- The arginine finger's precise positioning or multivalent interactions are critical.
- Drug-based chemical rescue for oncogenic Ras may require complex bifunctional properties.
Related Concept Videos
Small GTPases - Ras and Rho
Three regulatory proteins control their activity:
The Ras Gene
Ras is a...
Rab Cascades
GTPases and their Regulation
Large G-proteins,...
Rab Proteins
Rab proteins switch between a cytosolic, GDP-bound inactive state and a membrane-anchored, GTP-bound active state. By themselves, Rabs show slow rates of GDP/GTP exchange and GTP hydrolysis. Thus, Rab proteins are considered...
Activation and Inactivation of G Proteins

