Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Analysis of Human T Cell Activity in an Allogeneic Co-Culture Setting of Pre-Treated Tumor Cells
Published on: March 7, 2025
Immune selection determines tumor antigenicity and influences response to checkpoint inhibitors
Luis Zapata1, Giulio Caravagna2,3, Marc J Williams4
1Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. luis.zapata@icr.ac.uk.
Abstract:
In cancer, evolutionary forces select for clones that evade the immune system. Here we analyzed >10,000 primary tumors and 356 immune-checkpoint-treated metastases using immune dN/dS, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous mutations in the immunopeptidome, to measure immune selection in cohorts and individuals. We classified tumors as immune edited when antigenic mutations were removed by negative selection and immune escaped when antigenicity was covered up by aberrant immune modulation. Only in immune-edited tumors was immune predation linked to CD8 T cell infiltration. Immune-escaped metastases experienced the best response to immunotherapy, whereas immune-edited patients did not benefit, suggesting a preexisting resistance mechanism. Similarly, in a longitudinal cohort, nivolumab treatment removes neoantigens exclusively in the immunopeptidome of nonimmune-edited patients, the group with the best overall survival response. Our work uses dN/dS to differentiate between immune-edited and immune-escaped tumors, measuring potential antigenicity and ultimately helping predict response to treatment.
Insights
Cancer evolution shapes tumor immunity. Researchers used immune dN/dS to classify tumors as immune-edited or immune-escaped, finding immune-escaped tumors respond best to immunotherapy, unlike immune-edited ones.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Evolutionary Biology
Background:
- Cancer cells evolve to evade immune detection.
- Immune selection pressure influences tumor progression and treatment response.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a method for quantifying immune selection pressure in tumors.
- To differentiate between immune-edited and immune-escaped tumors.
- To predict immunotherapy response based on immune editing status.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of >10,000 primary tumors and 356 immunotherapy-treated metastases.
- Calculation of immune dN/dS (ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous mutations in the immunopeptidome).
- Classification of tumors into immune-edited and immune-escaped categories based on selection signatures.
Main Results:
- Immune-edited tumors showed negative selection on antigenic mutations and CD8 T cell infiltration.
- Immune-escaped tumors were associated with aberrant immune modulation.
- Immune-escaped metastases responded better to immune-checkpoint blockade than immune-edited tumors.
- Nivolumab treatment removed neoantigens in non-immune-edited patients, correlating with better survival.
Conclusions:
- Immune dN/dS is a valuable metric for assessing immune selection in cancer.
- Tumor immune editing status can predict response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors.
- Distinguishing between immune-edited and immune-escaped tumors aids in personalized cancer therapy strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cell-mediated Immune Responses
T Cell Activation and Clonal Selection
Naive T cells that have not yet encountered an antigen express two primary CD...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...

