Variability Across Caregiver and Performance-Based Measures of Executive Functioning in an Acute Pediatric

Kera R Larson1, Lauren A Demers1,2, Emily Z Holding3

  • 1Division of Pediatric Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Neurotrauma Reports
|March 10, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) survivors of traumatic brain injury (TBI) show different executive functioning (EF) results on caregiver reports versus performance tests. Injury severity impacts performance, not caregiver reports.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Pediatric Intensive Care
  • Traumatic Brain Injury

Background:

  • Youth with traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) often experience lasting cognitive deficits, specifically in executive functioning (EF).
  • The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning, Second Edition (BRIEF-2) is a common caregiver-reported tool for assessing daily EF, but its accuracy may be affected by external factors.
  • Discrepancies between caregiver reports and objective measures highlight the need for comprehensive EF assessment in pediatric TBI recovery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the relationship between the BRIEF-2 and performance-based EF measures in youth recovering from TBI post-PICU admission.
  • To explore how family distress, injury severity, and pre-existing neurodevelopmental conditions influence EF outcomes.
  • To understand the differences between subjective caregiver perceptions and objective performance measures of EF in pediatric TBI.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 65 youths (8-19 years) admitted to the PICU for TBI and referred for follow-up care were assessed.
  • The study compared scores from the BRIEF-2 with results from performance-based EF tests.
  • Statistical analyses investigated correlations between EF measures, injury severity, family distress, and pre-existing conditions.

Main Results:

  • No significant correlations were found between BRIEF-2 scores and performance-based EF measures.
  • Injury severity strongly correlated with performance-based EF measures, but not with BRIEF-2 scores.
  • Caregiver-reported quality of life was associated with their BRIEF-2 responses, indicating potential caregiver-related influences.

Conclusions:

  • Performance-based and caregiver-report measures capture distinct aspects of executive functioning in youth recovering from TBI.
  • Injury severity is a significant factor in objective EF performance, independent of caregiver perception.
  • Comprehensive assessment considering both objective performance and caregiver reports, alongside other morbidities, is crucial for understanding EF deficits post-PICU TBI.