Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Relative optimized linearization for radiochromic film dosimetry with non-uniformity correction.

Medical physics·2025
Same author

A formalism and methodology for measurement and control of LINAC isocenter.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
07:31

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator

Published on: May 9, 2014

11.9K

An improved method for evaluating LINAC isocenter.

Nicholas G Zacharopoulos1, David A Fenyes1

  • 1Aktina Medical Corp, Congers, New York, USA.

Medical Physics
|March 10, 2023
PubMed
Summary

A new method using the M-matrix improves medical linear accelerator (LINAC) isocenter quality assurance by predicting beam-to-target errors. This approach enhances accuracy and identifies issues missed by traditional Winston-Lutz (WL) techniques.

Keywords:
Winston-Lutzisocenterradiosurgery

More Related Videos

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.3K
Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments
06:08

Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments

Published on: May 26, 2019

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
07:31

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator

Published on: May 9, 2014

11.9K
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.3K
Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments
06:08

Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments

Published on: May 26, 2019

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Traditional medical linear accelerator (LINAC) isocenter quality assurance relies on the Winston-Lutz (WL) test, a scalar metric with limited insight into beam-to-target accuracy during gantry and couch motion.
  • Existing methods do not fully account for geometric errors, potentially overlooking critical inaccuracies in treatment delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a more sensitive method for verifying LINAC isocenter accuracy.
  • To account for geometric errors typically overlooked by conventional WL techniques.
  • To improve prediction of beam-to-target accuracy across various gantry and couch positions.

Main Methods:

  • Constructed a 3D coordinate system from WL images to determine radiation beam axis and marker shift locations.
  • Developed the M-matrix, a novel performance metric predicting beam-to-target errors based on gantry and couch positions.
  • Introduced 'clinical isocenter' as an optimized target for tumor positioning, derived from the M-matrix cost function.
  • Demonstrated the technique on a clinical LINAC, comparing pre- and post-repositioning marker shifts, radiation isocenter, and M-matrix.
  • Validated the M-matrix against traditional WL techniques using Monte Carlo simulations with variations in LINAC geometry, marker position, and measurement noise.

Main Results:

  • Successfully demonstrated the M-matrix technique on a Varian LINAC, with repositioning to the clinical isocenter resulting in an error matrix magnitude below 0.81 mm.
  • Marker position had minimal impact on radiation and clinical isocenter locations and radius.
  • Verification confirmed the M-matrix's accuracy in predicting geometric inaccuracies between the radiation beam and tumor.
  • Monte Carlo simulations showed the M-matrix is more sensitive and specific than traditional WL techniques for detecting potential treatment errors.

Conclusions:

  • Developed and validated a framework for LINAC isocenter verification using a 3D model derived from WL images.
  • The M-matrix replaces the scalar isocenter radius, offering insights into couch and beam contributions to isocenter quality and revealing errors missed by traditional methods.
  • The clinical isocenter offers an alternative to physical isocenter for tumor positioning, particularly in cases of suboptimal LINAC geometry.