Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

171
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
171
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.0K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

71
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
71
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

133
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
133
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.7K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional principal component analysis forsparse censored data.

Biometrika·2026
Same author

Bayesian adaptive randomization in the I-SPY2 sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Empirical Bound Information-Directed Sampling for Norm-Agnostic Bandits.

Reinforcement learning journal·2026
Same author

Assessing the utility of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) as a screening tool among caregivers of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survivors.

Cancer·2026
Same author

Independent Increments and Group Sequential Tests.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

A Pilot Study of the Cancer Distress Coach-Caregiver App: A Digital Intervention for Reducing PTSD Symptoms in HCT Caregivers.

Psycho-oncology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 7, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Interim monitoring of sequential multiple assignment randomized trials using partial information.

Cole Manschot1, Eric Laber2, Marie Davidian1

  • 1Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

Biometrics
|March 10, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method for interim analysis in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs). The proposed estimator improves efficiency by using partial participant data, leading to reduced sample sizes for multistage treatment regime evaluation.

Keywords:
augmented inverse probability weightingclinical trialsdouble robustnessdynamic treatment regimesearly stoppinggroup sequential analysis

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 7, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) are crucial for evaluating multistage treatment regimes.
  • Interim monitoring in SMARTs is challenging due to participants being at different treatment stages.
  • Existing methods for interim analysis in SMARTs may not fully utilize available data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a more efficient estimator for mean outcomes in SMARTs during interim analyses.
  • To derive statistical procedures for early stopping based on the proposed estimator.
  • To compare the performance of the new estimator against existing methods.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed an estimator for mean outcomes that incorporates partial data from all participants.
  • Derived Pocock and O'Brien-Fleming testing procedures for early stopping.
  • Conducted simulation experiments to evaluate the estimator's performance.

Main Results:

  • The proposed estimator effectively controls type I error and achieves nominal power.
  • The new method demonstrated a reduction in expected sample size compared to previous approaches.
  • Simulations confirmed the efficiency gains from utilizing partial participant data.

Conclusions:

  • The developed estimator offers a more efficient approach to interim analysis in SMARTs.
  • This method allows for principled early stopping while maximizing data utilization.
  • The findings have implications for designing and conducting adaptive clinical trials for complex treatment strategies.