Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

08:09
Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
11.5K
Postoperative Course of Reconstructive Procedures in FGM Type III-Proposal for a Modified Classification of Type III
Uwe von Fritschen1, Cornelia Strunz2, Roland Scherer2
1Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery, HELIOS Hospital Emil von Behring, Walterhöferstr. 11, 14165 Berlin, Germany.
Summary
Female genital mutilation (FGM) Type III reconstruction shows that a resected clitoral glans significantly increases operative time and complication risk. A new grading system is proposed to improve research and treatment comparisons for FGM.
Area of Science:
- Medical Science
- Surgical Reconstruction
- Public Health
Background:
- Female genital mutilation (FGM) reconstruction has evolved beyond treating complications to encompass body image and sexual function.
- Limited evidence directly links FGM to sexual dysfunction.
- The current WHO classification for FGM is imprecise, hindering comparative studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel grading system for Type III FGM reconstruction.
- To evaluate operative time and postoperative outcomes in relation to clitoral glans integrity.
- To address limitations of the existing WHO classification.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 85 patients with FGM-Type III at the Desert Flower Center.
- Evaluation of clitoral involvement, operative time for prepuce reconstruction, and postoperative complications.
- Comparison of outcomes based on the degree of clitoral glans damage.
Main Results:
- A partly resected clitoral glans was observed in 42% of patients post-deinfibulation.
- Significantly longer operative times were noted in patients with completely or partly resected clitoral glans (p < 0.0001).
- Higher complication rates were observed in patients with a mutilated clitoral glans, though not statistically significant.
Conclusions:
- A resected clitoral glans in Type III FGM is associated with increased operative time and potential complications.
- The current WHO classification does not adequately address clitoral glans status.
- A new, more precise classification system is proposed to aid research and clinical practice.

