An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical...

The analytical results of normal contact stiffness for mechanical joint surfaces are quite different from the experimental data. So, this paper proposes an analytical model based on parabolic cylindrical asperity that considers the micro-topography of machined surfaces and how they were made. First, the topography of a machined surface was considered. Then, the parabolic cylindrical asperity and Gaussian distribution were used to create a hypothetical surface that better matches the real topography. Second, based on the hypothetical surface, the relationship between indentation depth and contact force in the elastic, elastoplastic, and plastic deformation intervals of the asperity was recalculated, and the theoretical analytical model of normal contact stiffness was obtained. Finally, an experimental test platform was then constructed, and the numerical simulation results were compared with the experimental results. At the same time, the numerical simulation results of the proposed model, the J. A. Greenwood and J. B. P. Williamson (GW) model, the W. R. Chang, I. Etsion, and D. B. Bogy (CEB) model, and the L. Kogut and I. Etsion (KE) model were compared with the experimental results. The results show that when roughness is Sa 1.6 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.56%, 157.9%, 134%, and 90.3%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 3.2 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.92%, 152.4%, 108.4%, and 75.1%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 4.5 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.89%, 158.07%, 68.4%, and 46.13%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 5.8 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.89%, 201.57%, 110.26%, and 73.18%, respectively. The comparison results demonstrate that the suggested model is accurate. This new method for examining the contact characteristics of mechanical joint surfaces uses the proposed model in conjunction with a micro-topography examination of an actual machined surface.