Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Physical, Chemical and Biological Characterization of Six Biochars Produced for the Remediation of Contaminated Sites
Published on: November 28, 2014
Physical, Thermal, and Chemical Properties of Fly Ash Cenospheres Obtained from Different Sources
Andrei Shishkin1, Vitalijs Abramovskis1, Ilmars Zalite2
1Rudolfs Cimdins Riga Biomaterials Innovations and Development Centre of RTU, Institute of General Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Materials Science and Applied Chemistry, Riga Technical University, Pulka 3, K-3, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
Abstract:
Cenospheres are hollow particles in fly ash, a by-product of coal burning, and are widely used as a reinforcement when developing low-density composites called syntactic foams. This study has investigated the physical, chemical, and thermal properties of cenospheres obtained from three different sources, designated as CS1, CS2, and CS3, for the development of syntactic foams. Cenospheres with particle sizes ranging from 40 to 500 μm were studied. Different particle distribution by size was observed, and the most uniform distribution of CS particles was in the case of CS2: above 74% with dimensions from 100 to 150 μm. The CS bulk had a similar density for all samples and amounted to around 0.4 g·cm-3, with a particle shell material density of 2.1 g·cm-3. Post-heat-treatment samples showed the development of a SiO2 phase in the cenospheres, which was not present in the as-received product. CS3 had the highest quantity of Si compared to the other two, showing the difference in source quality. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry and a chemical analysis of the CS revealed that the main components of the studied CS were SiO2 and Al2O3. In the case of CS1 and CS2, the sum of these components was on average from 93 to 95%. In the case of CS3, the sum of SiO2 and Al2O3 did not exceed 86%, and Fe2O3 and K2O were present in appreciable quantities in CS3. Cenospheres CS1 and CS2 did not sinter during heat treatment up to 1200 °C, while sample CS3 was already subjected to sintering at 1100 °C because of the presence of a quartz phase, Fe2O3 and K2O. For the application of a metallic layer and subsequent consolidation via spark plasma sintering, CS2 can be deemed the most physically, thermally, and chemically suitable.
More Related Videos
06:27Expression of Cementitious Pore Solution and the Analysis of Its Chemical Composition and Resistivity Using X-ray Fluorescence
Published on: September 23, 2018
11:14Two-way Valorization of Blast Furnace Slag: Synthesis of Precipitated Calcium Carbonate and Zeolitic Heavy Metal Adsorbent
Published on: February 21, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Pozzolans
Fly ash is...
Fineness of Cement
Direct...
Physical and Chemical Properties of Matter
Types of Cement II
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Atomization Methods
Strength and Heat of Hydration
The heat of hydration for each cement compound is significant; for instance, tricalcium aluminate (C3A) and...