Prevalence of peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) in suspected papilloedema in children

Luke Pratt1, Shahzaib Rehan2, Jack West2

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, Wales, UK. Luke.Pratt@wales.nhs.uk.

Eye (London, England)
|March 11, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) are common in children with suspected papilloedema, often causing pseudopapilloedema. These findings are frequently observed alongside true papilloedema and other causes of disc swelling.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Paediatric Ophthalmology
  • Neuro-ophthalmology

Background:

  • Suspected papilloedema is a common reason for paediatric ophthalmology referrals.
  • Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) have been identified as a potential cause of pseudopapilloedema.
  • Accurate diagnosis is crucial to avoid unnecessary invasive investigations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the frequency of PHOMS in children referred for suspected papilloedema.
  • To assess the role of PHOMS in pseudopapilloedema within this population.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of optic nerve optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans.
  • Inclusion of scans from children in a suspected papilloedema virtual clinic (August 2016 - March 2021).
  • Assessment for PHOMS by three independent assessors with inter-rater reliability analysis (Fleiss' kappa).

Main Results:

  • 220 scans from 110 paediatric patients were analyzed.
  • PHOMS were identified in 67.3% of patients (bilateral in 56.8%, unilateral in 43.2%).
  • Excellent inter-assessor agreement (kappa = 0.9865) was achieved; PHOMS were common across various disc findings.

Conclusions:

  • PHOMS are frequently detected in paediatric patients with suspected disc swelling.
  • PHOMS appear to be an independent cause of pseudopapilloedema.
  • PHOMS can coexist with true papilloedema and other causes of pseudopapilloedema, highlighting diagnostic complexity.
Abstract