Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
A first-level customization study of SAPS II with Norwegian Intensive Care and Pandemic Registry (NIPaR) data
Øyvind Bruserud1,2, Øystein Ariansen Haaland3, Reidar Kvåle1,2,4
1Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Updated mortality prediction models (MPMs) using local intensive care unit (ICU) data show improved performance over the original Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II). Regular customization of MPMs with local datasets is crucial for optimizing accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Health Informatics
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Mortality prediction models (MPMs) are essential for intensive care unit (ICU) benchmarking and stratification.
- These models require regular updates using local and contextual data for continued relevance.
- The Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) is a widely utilized MPM in European ICUs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To customize and evaluate an updated Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) model using recent Norwegian intensive care data.
- To compare the performance of the new customized model (Model C) against the original SAPS II (Model A) and a previously updated model (Model B).
Main Methods:
- A customized SAPS II model (Model C) was developed using data from the Norwegian Intensive Care and Pandemic Registry (NIPaR) from 2018-2020 (excluding COVID-19 patients).
- Model C's calibration, discrimination, and uniformity of fit were compared to the original SAPS II (Model A) and a 2008-2010 NIPaR-based model (Model B).
- Performance metrics included Brier score, Cox's calibration regression, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Main Results:
- Model C demonstrated superior calibration compared to Model A (Brier scores 0.132 vs. 0.143) and comparable calibration to Model B (0.133).
- Both Model C and Model B showed better uniformity of fit across various patient and admission characteristics than Model A.
- The updated models (B and C) exhibited acceptable discrimination with an AUC of 0.79.
Conclusions:
- Observed mortality and SAPS II scores have evolved, making updated MPMs superior to the original SAPS II.
- Regular customization of prediction models with local datasets is necessary to optimize their performance.
- External validation is recommended to confirm the findings of the updated SAPS II model.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)
SPSS streamlines the process from data preparation to analysis and reporting. It is characterized by its user-friendly interface, which conceals...
Self-Report Tests of Personality

