Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

41.1K
Overview
41.1K
What is Genetic Engineering?00:49

What is Genetic Engineering?

74.5K
Overview
74.5K
What are Viruses?00:50

What are Viruses?

115.7K
Overview
115.7K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

72.6K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
72.6K
Genetic Lingo01:11

Genetic Lingo

103.5K
Overview
103.5K
Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

54.3K
Overview
54.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Letters to the editor or correspondence written opaquely by AI/LLMs: a rising plague in science, but on whose shoulders does the onus of proof lie?

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same author

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Editorial: AI-assisted Letters to the Editor-Scope of a Growing Ethical and Practical Concern, and CORR's Approach to Managing It.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same author

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Writing and Editing, and the Rise of "Tortured Phrases" in Nursing Literature.

Nursing & health sciences·2026
Same author

The DoDof6-DoHY5 regulatory module mediates glucomannan biosynthesis in Dendrobium officinale by integrating jasmonate and light signaling.

The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology·2026
Same author

AI, bibliometric ethics, and the need for practical wisdom.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Expanding the scope of collective responsibility in neuro-oncology: The integrity of the published record.

Neuro-oncology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 7, 2025

A Genetic Screen to Isolate Toxoplasma gondii Host-cell Egress Mutants
14:56

A Genetic Screen to Isolate Toxoplasma gondii Host-cell Egress Mutants

Published on: February 8, 2012

13.1K

Is ChatGPT a valid author?

Jaime A Teixeira da Silva1

  • 1Independent researcher, Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa-ken 761-0799, Japan.

Nurse Education in Practice
|March 12, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Authorship ethics for AI tools like ChatGPT are examined, questioning the validity of shared authorship in academic publishing. The study assesses AI contributions against established International Committee of Medical Journal Editors authorship criteria.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Academic Publishing
  • Artificial Intelligence in Research

Background:

  • A recent article in Nurse Education in Practice listed ChatGPT as a co-author, raising questions about AI authorship.
  • This analysis scrutinizes the validity and ethical implications of this AI authorship.
  • The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) principles serve as the benchmark for assessment.

Discussion:

  • Authorship requires significant intellectual contribution and accountability, which current AI models cannot fulfill.
  • Listing AI as an author may misrepresent the human effort and expertise involved.
  • Ethical guidelines for AI in scholarly work need urgent development.

Key Insights:

  • ChatGPT, as a software, does not meet ICMJE criteria for authorship.
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence (AI)Authorship principlesCOPEEthicsICMJEResponsibility

More Related Videos

Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis DGGE
10:52

Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis DGGE

Published on: February 25, 2007

21.4K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

410

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 7, 2025

A Genetic Screen to Isolate Toxoplasma gondii Host-cell Egress Mutants
14:56

A Genetic Screen to Isolate Toxoplasma gondii Host-cell Egress Mutants

Published on: February 8, 2012

13.1K
Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis DGGE
10:52

Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis DGGE

Published on: February 25, 2007

21.4K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

410
  • Attributing authorship to AI blurs the lines of responsibility and accountability in research.
  • The validity of AI-assisted authorship requires careful consideration of established academic standards.

    • Outlook:

    • Future research should focus on developing clear guidelines for acknowledging AI contributions.
    • The academic community must address the ethical challenges posed by AI in scholarly publishing.
    • Defining the role of AI as a tool versus a contributor is crucial for maintaining research integrity.