What referring clinicians value most: Accuracy of radiology results and personal interactions with radiologists

We sought to identify which aspects of the referring clinician experience are most strongly correlated with overall satisfaction, and hence of greatest relevant importance to referring clinicians.

A survey instrument assessing referring clinician satisfaction throughout 11 domains of the radiology process map was distributed 2720 clinicians. The survey contained sections assessing each process map domain, with each section including a question about satisfaction overall in that domain and multiple more granular questions. The final question on the survey was overall satisfaction with the department. Univariate logistic regression and multivariate logistic regression were performed to assess the association between individual survey questions and overall satisfaction with the department.

729 referring clinicians (27%) completed the survey. Using univariate logistic regression nearly every question was associated with overall satisfaction. Amongst the 11 domains of the radiology process map multivariate logistic regression identified the following as mostly strongly associated with overall satisfaction: results/reporting overall (odds ratio 4.71; 95% confidence interval 2.15-10.23), section with which work most closely overall (3.39; 1.28-8.64), and inpatient radiology overall (2.39; 1.08-5.08). Other survey questions associated with overall satisfaction on multivariate logistic regression were attending radiologist interactions (odds ratio 3.71; 95% confidence interval 1.54-8.69), timeliness of inpatient radiology results (2.91; 1.01-8.09), technologist interactions (2.15; 0.99-4.40), appointment availability for urgent outpatient studies (2.01; 1.08-3.64), and guidance for selecting correct imaging study (1.88; 1.04-3.34).

Referring clinicians value most the accuracy of the radiology report and their interactions with attending radiologists, particularly within the section they work most closely.