Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

05:45
Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
Published on: January 7, 2019
10.7K
Machine learning-based ozone and PM2.5 forecasting: Application to multiple AQS sites in the Pacific Northwest
Kai Fan1,2,3, Ranil Dhammapala4, Kyle Harrington5
1Center for Advanced Systems Understanding, Görlitz, Germany.
Frontiers in Big Data
|March 13, 2023
Summary
A new machine learning (ML) air quality forecasting system improves predictions for ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the Pacific Northwest. This ML system offers a reliable, low-cost alternative to traditional chemical transport models (CTMs).
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Atmospheric Chemistry
- Data Science
Background:
- Pacific Northwest air quality is generally good but impacted by wildfires and wood burning, causing unhealthy events.
- Existing chemical transport models (CTMs) struggle to accurately forecast these specific air quality events in the region.
- Previous work demonstrated a machine learning (ML) system's reliability for ozone (O3) forecasting at a single site.
Purpose of the Study:
- To expand and evaluate an ML-based air quality forecasting system for both O3 and PM2.5 across the Pacific Northwest.
- To compare the performance of the ML system against the current operational CTM-based forecasts.
- To assess the ML system's effectiveness during wildfire and cold seasons for multiple pollutants.
Main Methods:
- Developed an ML forecasting system comprising ML1 (random forecast classifiers, multiple linear regression) and ML2 (two-phase random forest regression).
- Applied the ML system to predict O3 during wildfire seasons and PM2.5 during wildfire and cold seasons across available PNW monitoring sites (2017-2020).
- Evaluated ML forecasts against observations and compared them with CTM-based forecasts using metrics like R², Normalized Mean Bias (NMB), and Normalized Mean Error (NME).
Main Results:
- ML forecasts showed significant improvements over CTMs: O3 NMB reduced from 7.6% to 2.6%, NME from 18% to 12%.
- ML2 demonstrated superior PM2.5 forecasting, significantly reducing NMB and NME for both wildfire and cold seasons.
- The ML system captured more high-pollution events for both O3 and PM2.5 compared to CTMs.
Conclusions:
- The developed ML air quality forecasting system provides more reliable predictions than CTM-based forecasts for O3 and PM2.5 in the PNW.
- The ML system requires fewer computational resources and input datasets, making it a cost-effective solution.
- This low-cost, reliable ML system can effectively support regional and local air quality management efforts.
Related Concept Videos
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
1.9K
Precipitation and coprecipitation methods can be used to separate a mixture of ions in a solution. In qualitative inorganic analysis, ions that form sparingly soluble precipitates with the same reagent are separated based on the differences in solubility products. For example, consider the separation of Cu(II) and Fe(II) ions by precipitation as insoluble sulfides. First, copper(II) sulfide is precipitated by the addition of acidic H2S, where the dissociation of H2S is suppressed. Adding H2S...
1.9K
Precipitation Titration: Endpoint Detection Methods
1.9K
In argentometric precipitation titrations, endpoints can be detected visually by the Mohr, Volhard, and Fajans methods. In the Mohr method, adding a soluble chromate indicator gives an initial yellow color to the analyte solution. As the titrant is added, the first excess of silver ions forms a red silver chromate precipitate, marking the endpoint. The solution pH should be maintained at about 8 by adding solid CaCO3.
In the Volhard method, a standard excess of AgNO3 is first added to the...
In the Volhard method, a standard excess of AgNO3 is first added to the...
1.9K

