Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

625
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
625
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

575
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
575
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

752
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
752
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.2K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.2K
Distribution Reliability and Automation01:25

Distribution Reliability and Automation

141
Distribution reliability in electrical power systems is critical for ensuring an uninterrupted power supply to consumers at minimal cost. According to IEEE Standard Terms, reliability is the probability that a device will function without failure over a specified time period or amount of usage. For electric power distribution, this translates to maintaining continuous power supply and addressing customer concerns over power outages. Several indices, as defined by IEEE Standard 1366-2012, are...
141
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.8K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

KnowLife: a versatile approach for constructing a large knowledge graph for biomedical sciences.

BMC bioinformatics·2015
Same journal

Your Next State-of-the-Art Could Come from Another Domain: A Cross-Domain Analysis of Hierarchical Text Classification.

Machine learning·2026
Same journal

Linear Causal Discovery with Interventional Constraints.

Machine learning·2026
Same journal

Boolean matrix logic programming for active learning of gene functions in genome-scale metabolic network models.

Machine learning·2025
Same journal

Mining exceptional social behavior on attributed interaction networks.

Machine learning·2025
Same journal

Persistent Laplacian-enhanced algorithm for scarcely labeled data classification.

Machine learning·2025
Same journal

Ensuring medical AI safety: interpretability-driven detection and mitigation of spurious model behavior and associated data.

Machine learning·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 7, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K

Responsible model deployment via model-agnostic uncertainty learning.

Preethi Lahoti1,2, Krishna Gummadi3, Gerhard Weikum1

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarbrücken, Germany.

Machine Learning
|March 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces Risk Advisor, a new tool to predict machine learning (ML) system failures. It estimates risks and uncertainties, helping to ensure trustworthy AI in real-world applications.

Keywords:
Failure analysisTrustworthy MLUncertainty modeling

More Related Videos

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

654
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

410

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 7, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

654
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

410

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Trustworthy AI

Background:

  • Predicting machine learning (ML) system failures with production data is vital for trustworthy AI.
  • Existing methods lack comprehensive risk assessment and uncertainty decomposition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce Risk Advisor, a post-hoc meta-learner for estimating failure risks and uncertainties of any pre-trained black-box classification model.
  • Provide actionable insights into failure causes and guide risk mitigation strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Developed Risk Advisor, a meta-learner estimating risk scores and decomposing uncertainty into aleatoric and epistemic components.
  • Evaluated performance across diverse black-box models, real-world, and synthetic datasets simulating ML failure scenarios.

Main Results:

  • Risk Advisor reliably predicts deployment-time failure risks across various ML failure scenarios.
  • The system effectively distinguishes between failures due to data variability, shifts, and model limitations.
  • Risk Advisor outperforms existing baseline methods in failure risk prediction.

Conclusions:

  • Risk Advisor offers a robust solution for assessing and mitigating ML deployment risks.
  • Decomposition of uncertainty provides valuable guidance for targeted risk management.
  • The tool enhances the reliability and trustworthiness of AI systems in production environments.