Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is Genetic Engineering?00:49

What is Genetic Engineering?

74.5K
Overview
74.5K
CRISPR01:59

CRISPR

52.6K
Genome editing technologies allow scientists to modify an organism’s DNA via the addition, removal, or rearrangement of genetic material at specific genomic locations. These types of techniques could potentially be used to cure genetic disorders such as hemophilia and sickle cell anemia. One popular and widely used DNA-editing research tool that could lead to safe and effective cures for genetic disorders is the CRISPR-Cas9 system. CRISPR-Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced...
52.6K
In-vitro Mutagenesis01:16

In-vitro Mutagenesis

14.1K
To learn more about the function of a gene, researchers can observe what happens when the gene is inactivated or “knocked out,” by creating genetically engineered knockout animals. Knockout mice have been particularly useful as models for human diseases such as cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes.
14.1K
The Central Dogma01:20

The Central Dogma

23.1K
The central dogma explains the flow of genetic information from DNA nucleotides to the amino acid sequence of proteins.
RNA is the Missing Link Between DNA and Proteins
In the early 1900s, scientists discovered that DNA stores all the information needed for cellular functions and that proteins perform most of these functions. However, the mechanisms of converting genetic information into functional proteins remained unknown for many years. Initially, it was believed that a single gene is...
23.1K
Synthetic Biology02:55

Synthetic Biology

4.9K
Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary science that involves using principles from disciplines such as engineering, molecular biology, cell biology, and systems biology. It involves remodeling existing organisms from nature or constructing completely new synthetic organisms for applications such as protein or enzyme production, bioremediation, value-added macromolecule production, and the addition of desirable traits to crops, to name a few.
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...
4.9K
Genetic Material01:20

Genetic Material

1.9K
Within the human body, a complex and detailed system of trillions of cells works in unison to sustain life. Each cell houses a nucleus, which contains 46 chromosomes divided into 23 pairs. Chromosomes are highly coiled structures made of the genetic material DNA. These chromosomes are essential carriers of genetic information, with half inherited from the mother through her egg and the other half from the father's sperm, combining to create the unique genetic makeup of an individual.
1.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Impact of Nurse Practitioner Full Practice Authority on Chronic Condition-Related Readmissions and Emergency Department Visits in the United States.

Medical care·2026
Same author

A CRISPR/Cas9 assisted strategy for the conditional expression of human NF-kappaB c-Rel cDNA in mouse T cells: design, prospects, and challenges.

Transgenic research·2025
Same author

Think Beyond the Room: Measuring Relative Humidity in the Home Cage and Its Impact on Reproduction in Laboratory Mice, <i>Mus musculus</i>.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2024
Same author

A W1282X cystic fibrosis mouse allows the study of pharmacological and gene-editing therapeutics to restore CFTR function.

Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society·2024
Same author

In vivo editing of lung stem cells for durable gene correction in mice.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

Rhodopsin mislocalization drives ciliary dysregulation in a novel autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa knock-in mouse model.

FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology·2024
Same journal

Chat M.D.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2026
Same journal

Regulating genetic discrimination in Chinese employment: insights from thalassemia-related cases.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2026
Same journal

Still invisible? Legal and ethical treatment of intersex individuals in China.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2026
Same journal

The SNP consortium: background and context.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2026
Same journal

Two-faced Janus? Consent to participate in research and consent to data processing in the EHDS era: a comparative analysis of requirements and standards in eight European countries.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2026
Same journal

Mind, machine, and the law: reimagining neurotechnology governance through disability rights.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Stereotaxic Injection of a Viral Vector for Conditional Gene Manipulation in the Mouse Spinal Cord
08:39

Stereotaxic Injection of a Viral Vector for Conditional Gene Manipulation in the Mouse Spinal Cord

Published on: March 18, 2013

30.7K

Governing nonconventional genetic experimentation.

Maxwell J Mehlman1, Ronald A Conlon1, Alex Pearlman2

  • 1Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.

Journal of Law and the Biosciences
|March 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Community-led genetic research is growing, but lacks oversight. New gene-editing tools like CRISPR/Cas9 increase risks, necessitating enhanced self-governance and ethical guidelines for safety.

Keywords:
Geneticsgene editingnontraditional experimentationregulation

More Related Videos

Overexpressing Long Noncoding RNAs Using Gene-activating CRISPR
13:04

Overexpressing Long Noncoding RNAs Using Gene-activating CRISPR

Published on: March 1, 2019

8.9K
Mouse Genome Engineering Using Designer Nucleases
12:04

Mouse Genome Engineering Using Designer Nucleases

Published on: April 2, 2014

28.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Stereotaxic Injection of a Viral Vector for Conditional Gene Manipulation in the Mouse Spinal Cord
08:39

Stereotaxic Injection of a Viral Vector for Conditional Gene Manipulation in the Mouse Spinal Cord

Published on: March 18, 2013

30.7K
Overexpressing Long Noncoding RNAs Using Gene-activating CRISPR
13:04

Overexpressing Long Noncoding RNAs Using Gene-activating CRISPR

Published on: March 1, 2019

8.9K
Mouse Genome Engineering Using Designer Nucleases
12:04

Mouse Genome Engineering Using Designer Nucleases

Published on: April 2, 2014

28.9K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Bioethics
  • Biotechnology Governance

Background:

  • A growing number of individuals conduct genetic and genomic research outside traditional academic and corporate settings.
  • These non-traditional research activities, often termed community science or citizen science, are a source of innovation but operate with limited regulatory oversight.
  • Historically, limited gene-targeting technologies meant these activities attracted little regulatory attention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the implications of accessible gene-editing technologies for unregulated genetic research.
  • To assess the adequacy of current governance frameworks for community-led genetic research.
  • To propose recommendations for enhancing self-governance and ethical practices in this domain.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current regulatory frameworks for genetic and genomic research.
  • Analysis of the impact of new technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 on accessibility and capability in non-traditional research settings.
  • Exploration of existing models for community-based ethical oversight.

Main Results:

  • Advanced gene-editing technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 are increasingly accessible and affordable, empowering non-conventional experimenters.
  • The current laissez-faire governance approach may be inadequate to address the potential risks and ethical challenges posed by these technologies.
  • Existing regulatory systems do not adequately cover the activities of individuals conducting genetic research outside established institutions.

Conclusions:

  • Enhanced self-governance mechanisms are crucial for ensuring safe and ethical practices in community-led genetic research.
  • Recommendations include establishing representative organizations, creating community Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), and fostering an ethical obligation for reporting concerning experiments.
  • Proactive development of governance strategies is needed to balance innovation with responsibility in the evolving landscape of genetic research.