Pyrazolones Potentiate Colistin Activity against MCR-1-Producing Resistant Bacteria: Computational and

Chonnikan Hanpaibool1, Natharin Ngamwongsatit2,3, Puey Ounjai4,5

  • 1Center of Excellence in Biocatalyst and Sustainable Biotechnology, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

ACS Omega
|March 13, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Pyrazolones can restore colistin susceptibility in bacteria producing mcr-1, but not mcr-3. This difference is due to structural variations in the MCR-1 and MCR-3 active sites, impacting pyrazolone binding and effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Drug Discovery

Background:

  • Colistin is a last-resort antibiotic against extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.
  • Mobile colistin resistance (mcr) genes, particularly mcr-1 and mcr-3, confer resistance by modifying lipid A.
  • Understanding the structural basis of resistance is crucial for developing strategies to overcome it.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential effects of pyrazolones on mcr-1 and mcr-3 mediated colistin resistance.
  • To elucidate the structural basis for the observed differential activity using molecular dynamics simulations and virtual screening.
  • To identify potential inhibitors targeting phosphoethanolamine transferase activity.

Main Methods:

  • Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of MCR-1 and MCR-3 catalytic domains.
  • Virtual screening of 20 pyrazolone derivatives against MCR-1 and MCR-3 active sites.
  • Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays to assess restored colistin susceptibility in mcr-1 and mcr-3 expressing E. coli.

Main Results:

  • MCR-1 active site shows greater water accessibility than MCR-3, with less influence from protonation state changes.
  • Virtual screening identified common interaction residues in the catalytic threonine site for both MCR-1 and MCR-3, alongside differential interactions.
  • The pyrazolone derivative ST3f restored colistin susceptibility in mcr-1 expressing E. coli but not in mcr-3 expressing strains.

Conclusions:

  • Structural differences in the MCR-1 and MCR-3 active sites contribute to differential pyrazolone binding and efficacy.
  • Pyrazolones show promise in restoring colistin susceptibility against mcr-1 producing bacteria.
  • Further research into pyrazolones as phosphoethanolamine transferase inhibitors with differential activity against mcr isoforms is warranted.