Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Frequency analysis of gut EMG.

S N Reddy1, S M Collins, E E Daniel

  • 1Department of Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
|January 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do gap junctions couple interstitial cells of Cajal pacing and neurotransmission to gastrointestinal smooth muscle?

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2001
Same author

nNOS in canine lower esophageal sphincter: colocalized with Cav-1 and Ca2+-handling proteins?

American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology·2001
Same author

Gap junctions in gastrointestinal muscle contain multiple connexins.

American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology·2001
Same author

Vasorelaxant effects of pramanicin, an anti-fungal agent: selective action on endothelial cells.

Japanese journal of pharmacology·2001
Same author

Tetrandrine inhibits Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ channels in vascular endothelial cells.

Life sciences·2001
Same author

Caveolae from canine airway smooth muscle contain the necessary components for a role in Ca(2+) handling.

American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology·2000

Analyzing gut smooth muscle electrical control activity (ECA) is crucial for understanding gastrointestinal motility. This study compares analysis techniques, finding period analysis best for upper gut and spectral analysis for colonic EMG.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Physiology

Background:

  • Gut smooth muscle electromyography (EMG) regulates gastrointestinal motility.
  • EMG comprises electrical control activity (ECA) and spike potentials causing contractions.
  • Accurate ECA signal processing is vital to avoid misleading interpretations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate optimal processing methods for gut EMG's electrical control activity (ECA).
  • To discuss factors influencing gut EMG composition in time and space.
  • To compare visual, period, and Fourier analysis techniques for ECA.

Main Methods:

  • Review of visual, period, and Fourier analysis techniques for gut EMG.
  • Discussion of computer implementation considerations for Fourier analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application and illustration of analysis methods to stomach and colon ECAs in dogs and humans.

    • Main Results:

    • Period analysis is well-suited for visibly oscillatory upper gut EMG.
    • Smoothed spectral analysis is more appropriate for colonic EMG.
    • Different analysis techniques have distinct uses and limitations.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of analysis technique depends on the specific region of the gastrointestinal tract.
    • Period analysis effectively studies upper gut ECA oscillations.
    • Smoothed spectral analysis is recommended for colonic ECA.