Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Bloodless Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy Assisted by Bipolar Radiofrequency Excision Hemostatic Device
Published on: November 4, 2022
Pacemaker Pocket Infection After Splenectomy
Ramachandra Barik1, Pranjit Deb1, Abhinav Kumar1
1Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Abstract:
A post-splenectomy patient suffers from frequent infections due to capsulated bacteria like Streptococcus pneumoniae, Hemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis despite vaccination because of a lack of memory B lymphocytes. Pacemaker implantation after splenectomy is less common. Our patient underwent splenectomy for splenic rupture after a road traffic accident. He developed a complete heart block after seven years, during which a dual-chamber pacemaker was implanted. However, he was operated on seven times to treat the complication related to that pacemaker over a period of one year because of various reasons, which have been shared in this case report. The clinical translation of this interesting observation is that, though the pacemaker implantation procedure is a well-established procedure, the procedural outcome is influenced by patient factors like the absence of a spleen, procedural factors like septic measures, and device factors like the reuse of an already-used pacemaker or leads.
Insights
Post-splenectomy patients face increased infection risk. This case highlights how spleen absence, procedural issues, and device factors complicate pacemaker implantation, leading to multiple revisions.
Area of Science:
- Medicine
- Cardiology
- Immunology
Background:
- Splenectomy increases susceptibility to encapsulated bacterial infections due to impaired immune response.
- Pacemaker implantation is a common procedure, but its outcomes can be affected by patient-specific factors.
Observation:
- A patient with a history of splenectomy due to splenic rupture developed complete heart block seven years post-injury.
- A dual-chamber pacemaker was implanted, but the patient required seven subsequent surgeries within one year due to complications.
Findings:
- The patient's post-splenectomy status likely contributed to complications following pacemaker implantation.
- Factors including septic measures and device-related issues (e.g., reuse of components) influenced procedural outcomes.
Implications:
- This case underscores the importance of considering asplenia when managing pacemaker patients.
- Optimizing procedural protocols and device management is crucial to minimize complications in vulnerable patient populations.
More Related Videos
04:00Laparoscopic Splenectomy with Pericardial Devascularization for Hypersplenism and Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage Due to Portal Hypertension
Published on: November 15, 2024
02:09Application of Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy with Total Blood Flow Occlusion in Benign Splenic Lesions
Published on: December 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Pericarditis I: Introduction
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization