Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
Published on: September 18, 2020
Lower Extremity Energy Dissipation and Generation During Jump Landing and Cutting in Patients With Chronic Ankle
Seunguk Han1, Hyunwook Lee1, Minsub Oh1
1Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
Context:
Participants with chronic ankle instability (CAI) frequently display altered movement patterns during functional movements. However, it remains unclear how these altered joint kinematics during jump landing negatively affect ankle joint health in the CAI population. Calculating joint energetics may offer an important method to estimate the magnitude of lower extremity joint loading during functional movements in participants with CAI.
Objective:
To determine differences in energy dissipation and generation by the lower extremity during maximal jump landing and cutting among groups with CAI, copers, and controls.
Design:
Cross-sectional study.
Setting:
Laboratory.
Patients Or Other Participants:
Forty-four participants with CAI, 44 copers, and 44 controls.
Main Outcome Measures(S):
Kinematics and kinetics of the lower extremity and ground reaction force data were collected during a maximal jump-landing and cutting task. The product of angular velocity in the sagittal plane and joint moment data represented joint power. Energy dissipation and generation by the ankle, knee, and hip joints were calculated by integrating regions of the joint power curve.
Results:
Participants with CAI displayed reduced ankle energy dissipation (35.9% ± 10.1%) and generation (31.6% ± 12.8%; P < .01) compared with copers (dissipation = 43.6% ± 11.1%; generation = 40.4% ± 12.0%) and controls (dissipation = 41.3% ± 11.1%; generation = 39.6% ± 12.0%) during maximal jump landing and cutting. Participants with CAI also displayed greater energy dissipation at the knee (45.1% ± 9.1%) than copers (39.7% ± 9.5%) during the loading phase and greater energy generation at the hip than controls (36.6% ± 16.8% versus 28.3% ± 12.8%) during the cutting phase. However, copers displayed no differences in joint energetics compared with controls.
Conclusions:
Participants with CAI displayed differences in both energy dissipation and generation by the lower extremity during maximal jump landing and cutting. However, copers did not show altered joint energetics, which may represent a coping mechanism to avoid further injuries.
Related Concept Videos
Ankle Joint
Pulse Assessment Sites
Bones of the Lower Limb: Tibia and Fibula

