Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

153
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
153
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

308
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
308
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

133
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
133
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.0K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

8.3K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
8.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

436
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
436

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Therapeutic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Sheep Placenta in the Treatment of Skin Disorders.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

Toward Evidence Synthesis of Adverse Events in Imbalanced Time-to-Event Data.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

Low-Temperature Deposition of Polycrystalline ε-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> for Deep Ultraviolet Perceptual Photodetection.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

A novel model (SED-GNDE) integrating graph neural differential equations with selective electrodialysis process for nutrient prediction from synthetic wastewater.

Water research·2026
Same author

Genomic analysis of <i>Botrytis cinerea</i> causing postharvest strawberry rot and the control effect of pydiflumetofen.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026
Same author

Trial design-aware funnel plot for publication bias assessment with noninferiority or equivalence objectives.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K

THE EFFECT DIRECTION SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN ASSESSING SMALL-STUDY EFFECTS.

Zhuo Meng1, Chong Wu2, Lifeng Lin3

  • 1Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States of America.

The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
|March 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Publication bias, or small-study effects, can skew research findings. New directional tests, considering the direction of effects, offer greater statistical power to detect these biases in meta-analyses.

Keywords:
DirectionMeta-analysisPublication biasRegression testSmall-study effectsStatistical power

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology
  • Evidence Synthesis

Background:

  • Publication bias, characterized by the overrepresentation of statistically significant findings, compromises the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
  • Small-study effects, a common manifestation of publication bias, typically exhibit a directional pattern influenced by whether the outcome is beneficial or harmful.
  • Conventional methods for assessing small-study effects often neglect the directional nature of these biases, potentially leading to inaccurate conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate novel directional tests for assessing small-study effects in meta-analyses.
  • To compare the performance of these proposed one-sided tests against conventional two-sided tests and other established methods.
  • To determine if incorporating the direction of effects enhances the detection and assessment of small-study effects.

Main Methods:

  • Development of one-sided regression tests based on Egger's regression framework.
  • Simulation studies to compare the statistical power and type I error rates of one-sided tests, two-sided tests, Begg's rank test, and the trim-and-fill method.
  • Application of the proposed methods to three real-world meta-analyses concerning infrabony periodontal defects.

Main Results:

  • Simulation studies indicated that the one-sided tests possess substantially higher statistical power compared to two-sided tests and other methods, with well-controlled type I error rates.
  • Application to real-world meta-analyses demonstrated that the directional one-sided tests effectively identified potential false-positive conclusions regarding small-study effects.
  • The one-sided tests proved more potent in detecting true small-study effects when their directionality was considered.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed directional (one-sided) tests offer a more powerful approach to assessing small-study effects in meta-analyses.
  • Incorporating the potential direction of effects is crucial for accurately evaluating publication bias.
  • Researchers are encouraged to adopt these directional methods to improve the reliability of evidence synthesis.