Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

13:44
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
3.6K
Engineering student experience and self-direction in implementations of blended learning: a cross-institutional
David Evenhouse1, Yonghee Lee2,3, Edward Berger2,3,4
1Department of Engineering and Computing Education, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH USA.
Summary
Students are key actors in implementing blended learning in STEM education. Understanding their self-directed learning behaviors and choices is crucial for successful educational innovation and faculty support.
Area of Science:
- STEM Education
- Educational Technology
- Higher Education
Background:
- Faculty-focused implementation of STEM educational innovations often overlooks student agency.
- Student engagement in blended learning hinges on self-directed learning behaviors, positioning students as critical implementers.
- This study examines engineering students' experiences with self-directed selection and implementation of blended learning resources.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore how engineering students self-direct the selection and implementation of blended learning resources.
- To understand students' roles as active implementers within educational innovations.
- To apply Actor-Network Theory to perceive students as individual actors in the implementation process.
Main Methods:
- Thematic analysis was employed in two stages.
- Stage one identified themes specific to student experiences at four institutions.
- Stage two identified key actors within students' reported experiences across all institutions.
Main Results:
- Student experiences with blended learning showed both similarities and differences across institutions.
- Institutional factors, instructor actions, learning environment components, and student needs influenced self-directed learning.
- Students' engagement decisions led to personalized and unique forms of interaction with learning opportunities.
Conclusions:
- Successful institutional implementation of blended learning depends on students' self-directed decision-making.
- Instructors should facilitate student implementation processes and foster learning behavior change.
- Understanding student implementation behaviors can enhance faculty efforts and empower students in innovative learning environments.
Related Concept Videos
Case Studies
11.7K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
11.7K
Purposive Learning
175
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
175
Metacognition
248
Metacognition is a conscious process where individuals are aware of their cognitive and executive processes, such as planning before solving a problem or self-monitoring during reading. For instance, a writer may need help with composing a piece. The situation involves a writer who is working on a piece of writing, but while doing so, they realize that something is missing. They notice that their characters lack depth or details. This realization occurs because the writer is reflecting on their...
248
Hindsight Biases
3.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.5K

