Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Standards of Care I01:22

Standards of Care I

743
Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:
743
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

706
Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
706
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

44.5K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.5K
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I01:30

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

1.1K
Quality documentation and reporting share essential characteristics that ensure they are practical and valuable resources for those who use them. These characteristics are:
Factual:  
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
1.1K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

133
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
133
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

1.2K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial Commentary: Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Improved Rotational Control, but Are We Redefining Failure?

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2026
Same author

Missing not at random : how much missing patient-reported outcome measure data is too much?

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Interesting data, but further corroborative studies are often needed.

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same authorSame journal

Erratum.

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Economic evaluation of robotic-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of cost and clinical outcomes.

EFORT open reviews·2026
Same author

Line-to-line cementation in hip arthroplasty : what is the current role of the 'French Paradox'?

The bone & joint journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 7, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

Consensus statements: when and how?

Iain R Murray1, Navnit S Makaram1, Robert F LaPrade2

  • 1Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

The Bone & Joint Journal
|March 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Consensus statements in bone and joint research offer valuable clinical insights but are Level V evidence. Critical appraisal of methodology and potential biases is essential for reliable conclusions.

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.9K
Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus
06:15

Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus

Published on: March 6, 2019

50.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 7, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.9K
Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus
06:15

Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus

Published on: March 6, 2019

50.1K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic research
  • Clinical practice guidelines

Background:

  • The Bone & Joint Journal frequently publishes consensus statements.
  • These statements have impacted clinical practice and policy.
  • However, all consensus statements have inherent limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the value of consensus studies in orthopedic research.
  • To emphasize the limitations of consensus statements, particularly their Level V evidence classification.
  • To stress the importance of critical appraisal of methodology and bias in consensus studies.

Main Methods:

  • This is a review and commentary on the nature and utility of consensus statements.
  • It references existing literature and established evidence grading systems.

Main Results:

  • Consensus studies provide significant value when higher-order evidence is lacking or ambiguous.
  • All consensus statements are considered Level V evidence.
  • Methodological rigor and bias assessment are crucial for validity.

Conclusions:

  • Consensus statements are a vital tool in orthopedic decision-making, especially in evidence-poor areas.
  • Users must critically evaluate the methodology and potential biases of any consensus statement.
  • Careful appraisal ensures the reliable application of consensus findings in clinical practice and policy.