Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
Comparable accuracy of femoral joint line reconstruction in different kinematic and functional alignment techniques
Lars-Rene Tuecking1, Peter Savov2,3, Mats Zander2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Diakovere Annastift, Anna Von Borries Str. 1-6, 30625, Hannover, Germany. Lars-rene.tuecking@diakovere.de.
Purpose:
A key part of kinematic alignment (KA) and functional alignment (FA) is to restore the natural femoral joint line, in particular the medial joint line. KA is known to reproduce the femoral joint line accurately; however, direct comparisons with other surgical techniques such as FA are currently lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences of alignment parameters in KA and FA techniques with a special focus given to the femoral joint line.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective radiological analysis of pre- and postoperative long leg radiographs of 221 consecutive patients with varus or neutral leg alignment, who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures from 2018 to 2020. Patients were assigned to one of four groups: (1) FA: image-based robotic-assisted TKA, (2) FA: imageless robotic-assisted TKA, (3): restricted KA: 3D cutting block-assisted (patient-specific instruments, PSI) TKA, (4): unrestricted KA: calipered technique. Patients' radiographs were (re)-analyzed for overall limb alignment, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), as well as medial and lateral femoral joint line alteration. Statistical significance was determined using unpaired t testing (FA vs. KA group) and one-way ANOVA (subgroup analyses).
Results:
Comparisons of KA vs. FA, as well as individual subgroups of KA and FA did not show any differences in the accuracy of medial joint line reconstruction (< 2 mm, p = 0.384, p = 0.744, respectively) and LDFA alteration (< 2°, p = 0.997, 0.921, respectively). Correction of MPTA (3.4° vs. 2.2°) and lateral femoral joint line (2.1 mm vs. 1.5 mm) was higher for FA and FA subgroups compared to KA and KA subgroups (both p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Kinematic and functional alignments showed a comparable accuracy in reconstruction of the medial femoral joint line and femoral joint line orientation. Increased correction of MPTA and lateral femoral joint line was recorded with FA techniques.
Level Of Evidence:
III.
