Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
Published on: June 28, 2018
Perturbation Theory Treatment of Spin-Orbit Coupling. III: Coupled Perturbed Method for Solids
Jacques K Desmarais1, Alberto Boccuni1, Jean-Pierre Flament2
1Dipartimento di Chimica, Università di Torino, via Giuria 5, 10125 Torino, Italy.
Abstract:
A previously proposed noncanonical coupled-perturbed Kohn-Sham density functional theory (KS-DFT)/Hartree-Fock (HF) treatment for spin-orbit coupling is here generalized to infinite periodic systems. The scalar-relativistic periodic KS-DFT/HF solution, obtained with a relativistic effective core potential, is taken as the zeroth-order approximation. Explicit expressions are given for the total energy through third-order, which satisfy the 2N + 1 rule (i.e., requiring only the first-order perturbed wave function for determining the energy through third-order). Expressions for additional second-order corrections to the perturbed wave function (as well as related one-electron properties) are worked out at the uncoupled-perturbed level of theory. The approach is implemented in the Crystal program and validated with calculations of the total energy, electronic band structure, and density variables of spin-current DFT on the tungsten dichalcogenide hexagonal bilayer series (i.e., WSe2, WTe2, WPo2, WLv2), including 6p and 7p elements as a stress test. The computed properties through second- or third-order match well with those from reference two-component self-consistent field (2c-SCF) calculations. For total energies, E(3) was found to consistently improve the agreement against the 2c-SCF reference values. For electronic band structures, visible differences w.r.t. 2c-SCF remained through second-order in only the single-most difficult case of WLv2. As for density variables of spin-current DFT, the perturbed electron density, being vanishing in first-order, is the most challenging for the perturbation theory approach. The visible differences in the electron densities are, however, largest close to the core region of atoms and smaller in the valence region. Perturbed spin-current densities, on the other hand, are well reproduced in all tested cases.
More Related Videos
08:04Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
05:51Isotopic Effect in Double Proton Transfer Process of Porphycene Investigated by Enhanced QM/MM Method
Published on: July 19, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling