Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025
Retinal Vascular Reactivity as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Published on: March 26, 2020
Utility of En Face OCT for the Detection of Clinically Unsuspected Retinal Neovascularization in Patients with
Kotaro Tsuboi1, Mehdi Mazloumi1, Yukun Guo1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Purpose:
To assess the value of en face OCT for detecting clinically unsuspected retinal neovascularization (RNV) in patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR).
Design:
A retrospective, cross-sectional study.
Participants:
Treatment-naïve patients clinically graded as NPDR in an ongoing prospective observational OCT angiography (OCTA) study at a tertiary care center.
Methods:
Each patient underwent imaging of 1 eye with a spectral-domain OCTA, generating a 17 × 17-mm widefield image by montaging four 9 × 9-mm scans. Two independent graders examined a combination of en face OCT, en face OCTA with a custom vitreoretinal interface slab, and cross-sectional OCTA to determine the presence of RNV. We measured the area of RNV flow within RNV lesions on en face OCTA.
Main Outcome Measures:
Detection rate of clinically occult RNV with OCT and OCTA.
Results:
Of 63 enrolled eyes, 27 (43%) were clinically graded as severe NPDR, 16 (25%) as moderate NPDR, and 20 (32%) as mild NPDR. Using the combination of en face OCT, en face OCTA, and cross-sectional OCTA, the graders detected 42 RNV lesions in 12 (19%) eyes, of which 8 (67%) were graded as severe NPDR, 2 (17%) as moderate NPDR, and 2 (17%) as mild NPDR. The sensitivity of en face OCT alone for detecting eyes with RNV was similar to that of en face OCTA alone (100% vs. 92%; P = 0.32), whereas the specificity of en face OCT alone was significantly lower than that of en face OCTA alone (32% vs. 73%; P < 0.001). For detecting individual RNV lesions, the en face OCT was 100% sensitive, compared with 67% sensitivity for the en face OCTA (P < 0.001). The area of RNV lesions that manual grading with en face OCTA alone missed was significantly smaller than that of manually detectable RNV (Mean [standard deviation] RNV flow area, 0.015 [0.020] mm2 vs. 0.16 [0.36] mm2; P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
The combination of en face OCT and OCTA can detect clinically occult RNV with high sensitivity. For screening these small lesions, en face OCT may be a useful imaging modality.
Financial Disclosure(S):
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
