Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025

Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase PCR Saliva Diagnostic Strategy utilizing Open-Source Pipetting Robots
Published on: February 11, 2022
Extraction-free clinical detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus from saline gargle samples using Hamilton STARlet liquid
Vijay J Gadkar1,2,3, David M Goldfarb4,5, Ghada N Al-Rawahi4,5
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Microbiology, Virology and Infection Control, BC Children's and Women's Hospital + Sunny Health Center, Vancouver, Canada. vijay.gadkar@cw.bc.ca.
This study introduces a new automated method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 using self-collected saline gargle samples. The process eliminates the need for nucleic acid extraction, a step that is typically time-consuming and requires manual labor. Instead, a robotic system called the Hamilton STARlet automates sample handling and PCR setup. A custom barcode scanning script allows the system to read sample IDs and initiate processing. The workflow uses pre-frozen PCR mixtures to speed up setup and reduce hands-on time. In validation testing, the system produced no false results and had a 3.6% retesting rate due to technical issues. The overall turnaround time was slightly faster than traditional methods, but the most significant benefit was a 76% reduction in hands-on time. This could help reduce staff fatigue and lower reagent costs in clinical labs.
Area of Science:
- Clinical virology diagnostics
- High-throughput PCR testing workflows
- Automation in medical laboratories
Background:
Clinical labs have struggled with high demand for SARS-CoV-2 testing during the pandemic, leading to shortages in reagents, staff, and sample collection systems. Traditional testing methods require nucleic acid extraction, a time-consuming and costly step. Prior research has shown that alternative sample types and automation can improve throughput. However, no prior work had resolved how to implement a fully automated, extraction-free system using widely available equipment. This gap motivated the development of a streamlined workflow using self-collected samples and a robotic liquid handler. The need for cost-effective and efficient testing remains unmet in many clinical settings. Standard methods still rely on manual steps that increase labor intensity. This paper introduces a novel approach to reduce both reagent use and staff workload.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study aimed to optimize high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing by eliminating nucleic acid extraction and automating sample handling. The specific problem addressed was the high labor and reagent demand in traditional testing protocols. The motivation was to reduce the burden on clinical staff and healthcare systems during the pandemic. The researchers proposed using self-collected saline gargle samples to minimize manual processing. They also aimed to reduce hands-on time by automating sample handling with the Hamilton STARlet. The goal was to maintain diagnostic accuracy while improving efficiency. The study focused on validating an automated workflow that could be widely adopted. The researchers sought to demonstrate that this approach could be both faster and less resource-intensive.
Main Methods:
The study used self-collected saline gargle samples to streamline SARS-CoV-2 testing. A Hamilton STARlet liquid handler was programmed to automate sample handling and PCR setup. A custom barcode scanning script was developed to identify sample tubes and initiate processing. Pre-frozen PCR reaction mixtures were used to reduce setup time. The system eliminated the need for nucleic acid extraction, a step typically requiring manual labor. Validation was performed on 1060 samples to assess accuracy and reliability. The automated system was compared to traditional workflows in terms of hands-on time and turnaround time. The study focused on measuring false positive and false negative rates, as well as retesting frequency due to technical issues.
Main Results:
The automated workflow produced no false positive or false negative results in both validation and live testing. Of 1060 validation samples, 3.6% (39/1060) required retesting due to single gene positivity, internal control failure, or liquid aspiration errors. The overall turnaround time was 185 minutes compared to 200 minutes in traditional workflows. However, hands-on time was reduced by 76%, potentially decreasing staff fatigue and burnout. The system used pre-frozen PCR mixtures to speed up assay setup. Sample handling was fully automated using the Hamilton STARlet and a custom barcode script. The elimination of nucleic acid extraction reduced reagent costs and labor. The study demonstrated that automated workflows can maintain diagnostic accuracy while improving efficiency.
Conclusions:
The study demonstrated that automated, extraction-free SARS-CoV-2 testing using self-collected saline gargle samples is feasible. The Hamilton STARlet system successfully reduced hands-on time by 76% without compromising diagnostic accuracy. No false positive or false negative results were observed in the validation set. The workflow maintained a 3.6% retesting rate due to technical issues, which is comparable to traditional methods. The use of pre-frozen PCR mixtures and automated sample handling reduced reagent costs and staff workload. The system's performance suggests it could be widely adopted in clinical settings. The authors propose that this approach could help alleviate staff fatigue and reduce the burden on healthcare systems. The findings support the use of automated workflows to improve high-throughput testing efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
The workflow eliminates nucleic acid extraction and uses a Hamilton STARlet liquid handler to automate sample handling and PCR setup.
The STARlet automates sample aspiration, aliquoting, and PCR setup, reducing hands-on time by 76% compared to traditional methods.
Pre-frozen mixtures reduce assay setup time and streamline the workflow, allowing for faster processing of large sample batches.
The script allows the Hamilton STARlet to read sample IDs and initiate processing, enabling primary tube sampling without manual labeling.
The validation showed a 3.6% retesting rate due to single gene positivity, internal control failure, or aspiration errors.
The authors suggest that the workflow could reduce staff fatigue and healthcare system burden by minimizing hands-on time and reagent use.

