Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
'Learning and growing together': exploring consumer partnerships in a PhD, an ethnographic study.
Ruth Cox1,2, Matthew Molineux3, Melissa Kendall4,5
1Occupational Therapy Department, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Corner Kessels and Troughton Roads, Coopers Plains, QLD, 4108, Australia. ruth.cox@health.qld.gov.au.
Consumer and community involvement (CCI) in health research PhDs is valuable yet challenging. Building supportive partnerships and equalizing power dynamics are key for successful co-production and reducing student isolation.
Area of Science:
- Health Research
- Doctoral Studies
- Co-production
Background:
- Consumer and Community Involvement (CCI) in health research is recognized as best practice.
- CCI aligns with principles of epistemic justice and transparent university collaborations.
- Examining consumer partnerships in PhDs is crucial given doctoral candidates' future role in co-production.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe and evaluate consumer partnerships within a PhD.
- To identify optimal approaches, impacts, benefits, and challenges of these partnerships.
- To gather perspectives from consumer co-researchers, the PhD candidate, and academic supervisors.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, co-produced ethnographic study over 33 months.
- Data collection included field notes, monthly logs, semi-annual interviews/focus groups, and a student reflexive diary.
- Qualitative data analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Main Results:
- A PhD partnership involved a student, two academics, and four consumer co-researchers, with significant time dedicated to CCI.
- Preparation for dissemination was the most frequent activity; the partnership was deemed worthwhile but challenging.
- Success factors included a collegial environment, regular meetings, and responsive co-learning; benefits were observed for individuals, research, and driving change.
Conclusions:
- Doctoral research can foster co-production, evolving over time.
- Equalizing power dynamics through relationship building and co-learning is critical.
- Supportive closure of the partnership is essential; CCI may reduce student isolation and procrastination.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Social Exchange Theory
Case Studies
Persuasion Strategies
Ethics in Research
Social Proof

