Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Endovascular Versus Medical Management of Atherosclerotic Renovascular Disease: Update and Emerging Concepts
Marco Pappaccogli1, Tom Robberechts2, Jean-Philippe Lengelé3,4
1Division of Internal Medicine and Hypertension Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy (M.P., F.R.).
Insights
Atherosclerotic renovascular disease, a common cause of hypertension, often requires multifaceted treatment. While percutaneous renal angioplasty was promising, recent trials show limited benefits, necessitating careful patient selection for revascularization.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Atherosclerotic renovascular disease is a leading cause of renovascular hypertension, particularly in aging populations and those with comorbidities like chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and coronary artery disease.
- It contributes to severe clinical issues, including flash pulmonary edema, progressive chronic kidney disease, and acute kidney injury.
- Management typically involves a combination of antihypertensive, antiplatelet, lipid-lowering, and optimized antidiabetic therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the limitations of previous studies on percutaneous renal angioplasty for atherosclerotic renovascular disease.
- To guide clinicians in identifying patients most likely to benefit from revascularization procedures.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and retrospective cohorts.
- Analysis of factors contributing to the discrepancy between initial enthusiasm and subsequent trial outcomes for renal artery angioplasty.
- Evaluation of diagnostic techniques, patient selection criteria, and procedural timing in revascularization studies.
Main Results:
- Randomized trials have largely failed to demonstrate significant benefits of percutaneous renal angioplasty over medical management for blood pressure, kidney function, and cardiovascular/renal outcomes.
- Previous positive findings from observational studies may be attributed to methodological limitations, including diagnostic heterogeneity and patient selection bias.
- Exclusion of patients with a higher likelihood of positive response may have contributed to the negative results in recent trials.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous renal angioplasty for atherosclerotic renovascular disease has not consistently met expectations set by earlier research.
- Critical appraisal of study methodologies and careful patient selection are essential for future research and clinical decision-making regarding revascularization.
- Identifying specific patient subgroups who may still benefit from renal artery angioplasty remains a key clinical challenge.
Abstract:
Atherosclerotic renovascular disease is the most frequent cause of renovascular hypertension and its prevalence increases with age and in specific subset of patients, such as those with end-stage chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and coronary artery disease. Besides hypertension, atherosclerotic renovascular disease is responsible for several clinical manifestations, including life-threatening conditions, such as recurrent flash pulmonary edema, rapidly progressive chronic kidney disease, or acute kidney injury. Atherosclerotic renovascular disease is usually part of a more diffuse atherosclerotic process and requires a combination therapy including antihypertensive, antiplatelet and lipid-lowering agents, as well as optimization of antidiabetic treatment, if needed. Besides medical therapy, percutaneous renal angioplasty was supposed to be the most effective therapy for atherosclerotic renovascular disease, by leading to blood flow restoration. However, despite an apparently solid rationale, several randomized clinical trials failed to confirm the favorable effects of percutaneous renal angioplasty on blood pressure control, kidney function, cardiovascular and renal outcomes, previously reported in observational, retrospective and single-center cohorts, switching off the enthusiasm for this procedure. Several studies' limitations may partly account for this failure, including heterogeneity of diagnostic techniques, overestimation of the degree of renal artery stenosis, inappropriate timing of revascularization, multiple protocol revisions, frequent crossovers, and most importantly exclusion of patients at higher likelihood to respond to angioplasty. The purpose of this review is to summarize studies' potential weaknesses and provide guidance to the clinician for identification of patients who may benefit most from revascularization.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
14:58Comprehensive Endovascular and Open Surgical Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations
Published on: October 20, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management