Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025

Assessment of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from Paddy Field by Means of Static Closed Chambers Maintaining Plants Within Headspace
Published on: September 6, 2018
Subsurface fertilization boosts crop yields and lowers greenhouse gas emissions: A global meta-analysis
Mohammad Saiful Islam Bhuiyan1, Azizur Rahman2, Irakli Loladze3
1Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, South Korea; Department of Soil Science, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.
Abstract:
The subsurface application (SA) of nitrogenous fertilizers is a potential solution to mitigate climate change and improve food security. However, the impacts of SA technology on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and agronomic yield are usually evaluated separately and their results are inconsistent. To address this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis synthesizing 40 peer-reviewed studies on the effects of SA technology on GHG and ammonia (NH3) emissions, nitrogen uptake (NU), crop yield, and soil residual NO3-N in rice paddies and upland cropping system. Compared to the surface application of N, SA technology significantly increased rice yields by 32 % and crop yield in upland systems by 62 %. The largest SA-induced increases in crop yield were found at low N input rates (<100 kg Nha-1) in rice paddies and medium N input rates (100-200 kg Nha-1) in upland systems, suggesting that soil moisture is a key factor determining the efficiency of SA technology. SA treatments increased yields by more at reduced fertilizer rates (~30 % less N), a shallow depth (<10 cm), and with urea in both cropping systems than at the full (recommended) N rate, a deeper depth (10-20 cm), and with ammonical fertilizer. SA treatments significantly increased NU in rice paddies (34 %) and upland systems (18 %), and NO3-N (40 %) in paddyland; however, NO3-N decreased (28 %) in upland conditions. Ammonia mitigation was greater in paddyland than in upland conditions. SA technology decreased the carbon footprint (CF) in paddyland by 29 % and upland systems by 36 %, and overall by 33 %. Compared with broadcasting, SA significantly reduced CH4 emissions by 16 %, N2O emissions by 30 %, and global warming potential (GWP) by 10 % in paddy cultivation. Given SA increased grain yield and NU while reducing NH3, CF, and GWP, this practice provides dual benefits - mitigating climate change and ensuring food security.
More Related Videos
07:32Monitoring Pedogenic Inorganic Carbon Accumulation Due to Weathering of Amended Silicate Minerals in Agricultural Soils.
Published on: June 4, 2021
10:29Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers
Published on: March 21, 2016
Related Concept Videos
What is Climate?
The Roles of Bacteria and Fungi in Plant Nutrition
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Microorganisms in Agriculture and Food industry
Overview of Metabolism
Plant Metabolism
Sunlight, the primary source of energy in plants, is first absorbed by the chlorophyll pigments present in their leaves. Plants then use this energy to carry out photosynthesis, where water is oxidized into oxygen and carbon dioxide...