Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025

Community-based Adapted Tango Dancing for Individuals with Parkinson's Disease and Older Adults
Published on: December 9, 2014
Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings
Caren Bacon1, Sara Malone1,2, Kim Prewitt1
1Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Background:
Within many public health settings, there remain large challenges to sustaining evidence-based practices. The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool has been developed and validated to measure sustainability capacity of public health, social service, and educational programs. This paper describes how this tool was utilized between January 2014 and January 2019. We describe characteristics of programs that are associated with increased capacity for sustainability and ultimately describe the utility of the PSAT in sustainability research and practice.
Methods:
The PSAT is comprised of 8 subscales, measuring sustainability capacity in eight distinct conceptual domains. Each subscale is made up of five items, all assessed on a 7-point Likert scale. Data were obtained from persons who used the PSAT on the online website (https://sustaintool.org/), from 2014 to 2019. In addition to the PSAT scale, participants were asked about four program-level characteristics. The resulting dataset includes 5,706 individual assessments reporting on 2,892 programs.
Results:
The mean overall PSAT score was 4.73, with the lowest and highest scoring subscales being funding stability and program adaptation, respectively. Internal consistency for each subscale was excellent (average Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94). Confirmatory factor analysis highlighted good to excellent fit of the PSAT measurement model (eight distinct conceptual domains) to the observed data, with a comparative fit index of 0.902, root mean square error of approximation equal to 0.054, and standardized root mean square residual of 0.054. Overall sustainability capacity was significantly related to program size (F = 25.6; p < 0.001). Specifically, smaller programs (with staff sizes of ten or below) consistently reported lower program sustainability capacity. Capacity was not associated with program age and did not vary significantly by program level.
Discussion:
The PSAT maintained its excellent reliability when tested with a large and diverse sample over time. Initial criterion validity was explored through the assessment of program characteristics, including program type and program size. The data collected reinforces the ability of the PSAT to assess sustainability capacity for a wide variety of public health and social programs.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
08:53Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Health Literacy