Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

6.7K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
6.7K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

6.1K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
6.1K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.8K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.8K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

7.7K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
7.7K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.4K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.4K
Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

11.2K
A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
11.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A novel robust estimation for high-dimensional precision matrices.

Statistics in medicine·2022
Same author

A Cholesky-based estimation for large-dimensional covariance matrices.

Journal of applied statistics·2022
Same author

A Cholesky-based sparse covariance estimation with an application to genes data.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2021
Same author

A Bayesian approach to modeling the interaction between air pollution and temperature.

Annals of epidemiology·2013
Same author

Constrained confidence intervals in time series studies of mortality and air pollution.

Environment international·2010

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 6, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K

Improved confidence estimation for the binomial proportion with applications to clinical studies.

Mo Yang1, Xiaoning Kang2, Borek Puza3

  • 1School of Finance, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, Liaoning, China.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|March 17, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers developed a new frequentist framework for binomial proportion confidence sets. This method optimizes precision using tail functions, offering improved confidence intervals for clinical studies.

Keywords:
Binomial proportionoptimal interval estimationprior expected widthtail function

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 6, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Confidence intervals are crucial for estimating binomial proportions in statistical inference.
  • Existing methods for constructing confidence intervals may not always be optimal in terms of precision.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish a comprehensive frequentist framework for binomial proportion confidence sets.
  • To develop an optimal confidence set by considering various precision measures.
  • To evaluate the performance of the proposed method in clinical study applications.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a frequentist framework where confidence sets are characterized by tail functions.
  • Defined precision using interval length and probability of false coverage.
  • Introduced a novel evaluation criterion incorporating prior information.
  • Constructed the optimal confidence set for the binomial proportion.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework encompasses all confidence sets with guaranteed frequentist coverage probability.
  • The optimal confidence set was constructed based on defined precision measures.
  • Application to clinical studies demonstrated the utility of the new methodology.
  • Confidence intervals derived from tail functions showed improved precision compared to existing methods.

Conclusions:

  • The established frequentist framework provides a unified approach to confidence sets for binomial proportions.
  • The newly proposed optimal confidence set offers enhanced precision.
  • The methodology holds significant potential for improving statistical analysis in clinical research.