Patient-reported outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma trials using combinations versus sunitinib as first-line

Kyle Nolla1, David J Benjamin2, David Cella3

  • 1Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. kylenolla@northwestern.edu.

Insights

New immunotherapy combinations significantly improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients compared to standard treatments. Standardized collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is crucial for future research.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Health-Related Quality of Life Research

Background:

  • Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatments have evolved with new immunotherapy options.
  • While clinical outcomes improve, the impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) requires thorough evaluation.
  • Current patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for HRQoL lack standardization, hindering comparative analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the HRQoL outcomes of various immunotherapy combinations versus standard tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy in mRCC.
  • To identify immunotherapy regimens that demonstrate superior HRQoL benefits for mRCC patients.
  • To highlight the need for standardized PROMs in clinical trials for reliable HRQoL assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of HRQoL data from six clinical trials involving immunotherapy combinations in mRCC.
  • Comparison of HRQoL results between treatments like nivolumab plus cabozantinib, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab against sunitinib.
  • Assessment of potential design flaws in trials that reported no HRQoL difference.

Main Results:

  • Nivolumab plus cabozantinib (CheckMate 9ER) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (IMmotion151) significantly outperformed sunitinib in HRQoL.
  • Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (CheckMate 214) and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (CLEAR) generally showed better HRQoL than sunitinib.
  • Two trials (JAVELIN Renal 101, KEYNOTE-426) with potential design flaws reported no HRQoL difference.

Conclusions:

  • Certain immunotherapy combinations offer significant HRQoL advantages for mRCC patients over sunitinib.
  • Standardized PROMs and rigorous trial design are essential for accurate and comparable HRQoL assessment in mRCC clinical trials.
  • Future research must prioritize robust HRQoL data collection and reporting to guide holistic treatment decisions.