Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025
3D Printing Model of a Patient's Specific Lumbar Vertebra
Published on: April 14, 2023
A novel three-dimensional-printed patient-specific sacral implant for spinopelvic reconstruction in sacral giant cell
ZhaoRui Lv1,2, Jianmin Li1, ZhiPing Yang1
1Department of Orthopedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Purpose:
Spinopelvic reconstruction after sacral tumour resection is one of the most demanding procedures in sacral tumour surgery. The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of spinopelvic reconstruction with 3D-printed prostheses in sacral giant cell tumours and the clinical outcomes and complications at follow-up.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed ten consecutive patients with giant cell tumors of the sacrum who underwent intralesional nerve-sparing resection with curative intent and custom implant reconstruction between 2016 and 2021. There were four males and six females with a mean age of 40.2 years (range, 25-62 years) at surgery. A computer-aided-design implant was prepared using 3D printing technology that was both matched to the bone defect and biomechanically evaluated. A 3D-printed surgical guide was used to replicate the resection procedure as planned. We analyzed operational outcomes, oncological outcomes, functional outcomes, complications, and prosthetic outcomes. Pain at rest was assessed according to a 10-cm VAS score. The results of functional improvement were evaluated using the MSTS-93 score at the final follow-up.
Results:
All patients were observed for 26 to 61 months, with an average follow-up of 43.8 months. No deep infection or prosthetic structural failure occurred in this study. A total of 80% of patients had good neurological function and normal urinary, bowel, and ambulatory functions. The mean MSTS score was 24.1 (range, 22-26). The mean VAS score was 2 (range 0 to 2). Delayed wound healing occurred in three patients, and the wounds healed after debridement. One case had local recurrence and survived tumour-free after resection of the recurrent lesion. An aseptic loosening was found in a patient that did not require secondary surgery. By radiographical assessments, we found that 90% of implants were well osseointegrated at the final follow-up examination.
Conclusions:
The 3D-printed sacral implants might provide a promising strategy for spinopelvic reconstruction in sacral giant cell tumours undergoing intralesional nerve-sparing surgery with satisfactory clinical outcomes, osseointegration, and excellent durability.
