Greater geographic sharing and heart transplantation waitlist outcomes following the 2018 heart allocation policy

Jessica R Golbus1, Jinming Li2, Thomas M Cascino3

  • 1Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Integrated Center for Health Analytics and Medical Prediction (MiCHAMP) and Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Insights

The 2018 heart transplant policy improved geographic sharing, significantly reducing wait times for patients. This policy led to more equitable access to heart transplantation across donation service areas.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transplant Surgery
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • A 2018 heart allocation policy aimed to decrease variability in heart transplantation access and outcomes.
  • The policy emphasized broader geographic sharing of donor hearts to achieve these goals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of the 2018 policy on geographic sharing of donor hearts.
  • To assess changes in waitlist outcomes, specifically time to transplant, following the policy implementation.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database.
  • Inclusion of adult patients waitlisted between October 2016 and October 2020, divided into pre- and post-policy periods.
  • Primary outcome measures included the proportion of imported/exported hearts by donation service area (DSA) and time to transplant.

Main Results:

  • The mean proportion of imported hearts increased from 32% to 74%, and exported hearts from 37% to 75% post-policy (p < 0.001).
  • The variance in the sharing ratio across DSAs decreased by 76%.
  • Mean time to transplant significantly decreased from 153.9 days pre-policy to 89.6 days post-policy (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

  • The 2018 heart allocation policy effectively increased geographic sharing of donor organs.
  • The policy resulted in more uniform access to heart transplantation and improved waitlist outcomes.
Abstract