Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.8K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.8K
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

408
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
408
Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

143
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
143
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

59.8K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.8K
Applications of IR Spectroscopy: Overview01:11

Applications of IR Spectroscopy: Overview

852
The non-destructive nature and ability to provide valuable chemical information make IR spectroscopy a versatile technique with broad applications in various scientific and industrial fields. IR spectroscopy is commonly used to identify and characterize organic and inorganic compounds. It provides information about the functional groups present in a molecule and the bonding between atoms. This helps in the structural elucidation of compounds during organic synthesis, pharmaceutical research,...
852

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brain activity as a candidate biomarker for personalised caffeine treatment in premature neonates.

Frontiers in pediatrics·2026
Same author

Options for the Forensic Mental Health Evaluator When Retaining Counsel Is Impaired.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same author

Neural correlates underlying high-frequency stimulation-induced secondary hyperalgesia in humans.

Pain reports·2025
Same author

Trust and mistrust in law enforcement by formerly incarcerated persons: Effects on Miranda reasoning using a mixed-methods design.

Journal of forensic sciences·2025
Same author

Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ): Psychometric Properties and Item-Level Empirical Correlates.

Clinical psychology & psychotherapy·2025
Same author

Badge of Courage: Pain and Suffering After Military Service in a Nonveteran.

Harvard review of psychiatry·2025
Same journal

Beyond the Adversarial Rivalry: A Developmental Rights-Based Model for Minor-on-Minor Crime, Part 2.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

Current State of Psychological Research on Intimate Partner Violence: Implications for Legal Proceedings.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

A Narrative Review on Juvenile Offense and the Impact and Implications of Internalizing Disorders.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

Behavioral and Cognitive Equivalence Threshold: Foundations for the Practical Extension of Atkins and Roper.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

The Adverse Childhood Experiences Paradigm and Forensic/Correctional Populations: A Scoping Review.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same journal

Front-End Governance of Juvenile Cybercrime in China: Platform Accountability, Risk Mitigation, and Tri-Partite Collaboration.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 6, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.2K

Forensic assessment instruments: Their reliability and applicability to criminal forensic issues.

Richard Rogers1, Kamar Y Tazi1, Eric Y Drogin2

  • 1University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA.

Behavioral Sciences & the Law
|March 19, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Forensic assessment instruments (FAIs) now offer specialized tools for legal evaluations, improving upon older methods. This review examines key FAIs for insanity, competency, and Miranda rights, aiding forensic practitioners.

Keywords:
FAIsFRIsMiranda evaluationscompetency to stand trialcriminal responsibilityforensic assessment instrumentsforensically relevant instrumentsinsanity evaluations

More Related Videos

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K
Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 6, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.2K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K
Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.6K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychology
  • Psychological Measurement
  • Legal Psychology

Background:

  • Forensic evaluations historically relied on general psychological tests.
  • Specialized measures have been developed and validated on forensic populations.
  • Distinction between forensic assessment instruments (FAIs) and forensically relevant instruments (FRIs) is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the development, validation, and application of six key FAIs.
  • To focus on FAIs addressing criminal forensic issues: insanity, competency to stand trial, and Miranda abilities/waivers.
  • To provide forensic practitioners with essential knowledge on FAIs for enhanced practice.

Main Methods:

  • Review and critical examination of six published FAIs.
  • Evaluation of reliability and validity data, particularly within forensic samples.
  • Brief exploration of FRIs related to response styles.

Main Results:

  • FAIs demonstrate specialized utility for psycholegal standards in criminal forensic contexts.
  • Reliability and validity of FAIs are assessed in relation to forensic populations.
  • FRIs offer complementary insights into response styles relevant to forensic evaluations.

Conclusions:

  • FAIs represent significant advancements in forensic evaluation methodology.
  • Understanding FAIs' psychometric properties is vital for accurate legal decision-making.
  • This review equips practitioners with knowledge to effectively utilize FAIs in criminal forensic settings.