Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Barriers to Meaningful Participatory Mental Health Services Research and Priority Next Steps: Findings From a
Nev Jones1, Linda Callejas1, Marie Brown1
1School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Jones, Pagdon); Child and Family Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa (Callejas); Department of Psychiatry, New York University, New York City (Brown); Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (Carras); Human Services Research Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Croft); New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Pagdon); Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago (Sheehan); Department of Community and Behavioral Health, School of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane (Oluwoye); Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, and Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London (Zisman-Ilani).
Objective:
A growing consensus has emerged regarding the importance of stakeholder involvement in mental health services research. To identify barriers to and the extent of stakeholder involvement in participatory research, the authors undertook a mixed-methods study of researchers and community members who reported participation in such research.
Methods:
Eight consultative focus groups were conducted with diverse groups of stakeholders in mental health services research (N=51 unique participants, mostly service users), followed by a survey of service users, family members, community providers, and researchers (N=98) with participatory research experience. Focus groups helped identify facilitators and barriers to meaningful research collaboration, which were operationalized in the national survey. Participants were also asked about high-priority next steps.
Results:
The barrier most strongly endorsed as a large or very large problem in the field was lack of funding for stakeholder-led mental health services research (76%), followed by lack of researcher training in participatory methods (74%) and insufficiently diverse backgrounds among stakeholders (69%). The two most frequently identified high-priority next steps were ensuring training and continuing education for researchers and stakeholders (33%) and authentically centering lived experience and reducing tokenism in research (26%).
Conclusions:
These findings suggest a need for increased attention to and investment in the development, implementation, and sustainment of participatory methods that prioritize collaboration with direct stakeholders, particularly service users, in U.S. mental health services research. The findings also underscore the presence and potentially important role of researchers who dually identify as service users and actively contribute a broader orientation from the service user-survivor movement.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Ethics in Research
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...

