Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Measuring multimorbidity in research: Delphi consensus study
Iris S S Ho1, Amaya Azcoaga-Lorenzo2, Ashley Akbari3
1Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK.
Objective:
To develop international consensus on the definition and measurement of multimorbidity in research.
Design:
Delphi consensus study.
Setting:
International consensus; data collected in three online rounds from participants between 30 November 2020 and 18 May 2021.
Participants:
Professionals interested in multimorbidity and people with long term conditions were recruited to professional and public panels.
Results:
150 professional and 25 public participants completed the first survey round. Response rates for rounds 2/3 were 83%/92% for professionals and 88%/93% in the public panel, respectively. Across both panels, the consensus was that multimorbidity should be defined as two or more long term conditions. Complex multimorbidity was perceived to be a useful concept, but the panels were unable to agree on how to define it. Both panels agreed that conditions should be included in a multimorbidity measure if they were one or more of the following: currently active; permanent in their effects; requiring current treatment, care, or therapy; requiring surveillance; or relapsing-remitting conditions requiring ongoing care. Consensus was reached for 24 conditions to always include in multimorbidity measures, and 35 conditions to usually include unless a good reason not to existed. Simple counts were preferred for estimating prevalence and examining clustering or trajectories, and weighted measures were preferred for risk adjustment and outcome prediction.
Conclusions:
Previous multimorbidity research is limited by inconsistent definitions and approaches to measuring multimorbidity. This Delphi study identifies professional and public panel consensus guidance to facilitate consistency of definition and measurement, and to improve study comparability and reproducibility.
More Related Videos
12:18A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
11:21Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
Published on: July 27, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care