Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2025
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
Comparison of Facial Growth between Two Nasoalveolar Molding Techniques in Patients with Unilateral Complete Cleft
Frank Chun-Shin Chang1, Jung-Ju Huang1, Christopher Glenn Wallace1,2
1From the Craniofacial Research Center, Department of Medical Research, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou.
Background:
Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) has become standard treatment in the authors' craniofacial center. There are two types of presurgical NAM: the Grayson and Figueroa techniques. The Grayson method involves active alveolar molding, and the Figueroa method involves passive alveolar molding. The authors previously found no differences in number of clinic visits, costs, or 6-month postoperative outcome between the two techniques. The authors extended the previous study to evaluate facial growth between these two groups.
Methods:
In this randomized single-blind study, conducted between May of 2010 and March of 2013, the authors recruited 30 patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and randomized them for Grayson or Figueroa presurgical NAM. Standard lateral cephalometric measurements at 5 years were used to determine facial growth.
Results:
Twenty-nine patients completed 5 years of follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in facial cephalometric measurements between the two groups.
Conclusion:
Presurgical NAM using either a passive or active NAM technique produced similar facial growth patterns after unilateral cleft lip and palate repair.
Clinical Question/Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic, II.
