Video Instruction for Pushing in the Second Stage: a randomized controlled trial

The second stage of labor requires active patient engagement. Previous studies suggest that coaching can influence the second stage of labor duration. However, a standardized education tool has not been established, and patients face many barriers to accessing childbirth education before delivery.

This study aimed to investigate the effect of an intrapartum video pushing education tool on the second stage of labor duration.

This was a randomized controlled trial of nulliparous patients with singleton pregnancies ≥37 weeks of gestation admitted for induction of labor or spontaneous labor with neuraxial anesthesia. Patients were consented on admission and block randomized in active labor to 1 of 2 arms in a 1:1 ratio. The study arm viewed a 4-minute video before the second stage of labor on what to anticipate in the second stage of labor and pushing techniques. The control arm received the standard of care: bedside coaching at 10 cm dilation from a nurse or physician. The primary outcome was second stage of labor duration. The secondary outcomes were birth satisfaction (using the Modified Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale), mode of delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, clinical chorioamnionitis, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and umbilical artery gases. Of note, 156 patients were needed to detect a 20% decrease in the second stage of labor duration with 80% power, 2-sided alpha level of .05, and 10% loss after randomization. Funding was provided by the Lucy Anarcha Betsy award from the division of clinical research at Washington University.

Of 161 patients, 81 were randomized to standard of care, and 80 were randomized to intrapartum video education. Among these patients, 149 progressed to the second stage of labor and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis: 69 in the video group and 78 in the control group. Maternal demographics and labor characteristics were similar between groups. The second stage of labor duration was statistically similar between the video arm (61 minutes [interquartile range, 20-140]) and the control arm (49 minutes [interquartile range, 27-131]) (P=.77). There was no difference in mode of delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, clinical chorioamnionitis, neonatal intensive care unit admission, or umbilical artery gases between groups. Although the overall birth satisfaction score on the Modified Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale was similar between groups, patients in the video group rated their "level of comfort during birth" and "attitude of the doctors in birth" significantly higher or more positively than patients in the control group (P<.05 for both).

Intrapartum video education was not associated with a shorter second stage of labor duration. However, patients who received video education reported a higher level of comfort and a more favorable perception of their physician, suggesting that video education may be a helpful tool to improve the birth experience.